Difference between revisions of "Talk:Google Summer of Code 2006"

From ReactOS Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(What point are/aren't relevant)
 
m
Line 1: Line 1:
== What point are/aren't relevant ==
+
== What points are/aren't relevant ==
  
 
Maybe we should remove/reject/improve some of the ideas. For example: the "explorer enhangements" idea look a bit vague to me. Also, I think ReactOS would be helped a lot more with for example full USB 2.0 functionality, sound or DirectX 9, than with a FOSS clone from already existing windows software.
 
Maybe we should remove/reject/improve some of the ideas. For example: the "explorer enhangements" idea look a bit vague to me. Also, I think ReactOS would be helped a lot more with for example full USB 2.0 functionality, sound or DirectX 9, than with a FOSS clone from already existing windows software.
  
On the other hand, we're helped with everything, and I think aplying students can judge for themselves what ideas are relevant, and which aren't.
+
On the other hand, we're helped with everything, and I think aplying students can judge for themselves what ideas are relevant and which aren't.

Revision as of 11:09, 19 April 2006

What points are/aren't relevant

Maybe we should remove/reject/improve some of the ideas. For example: the "explorer enhangements" idea look a bit vague to me. Also, I think ReactOS would be helped a lot more with for example full USB 2.0 functionality, sound or DirectX 9, than with a FOSS clone from already existing windows software.

On the other hand, we're helped with everything, and I think aplying students can judge for themselves what ideas are relevant and which aren't.