Difference between revisions of "Talk:Audit"

From ReactOS Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(Seriously...)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Since this article is linked prominently on the front page, it seems like a concise introduction would be a good idea for the benefit of random people.    Right now it seems to be focused more on 'how it's going' than 'what it is'.  :)  Maybe something like:
 
Since this article is linked prominently on the front page, it seems like a concise introduction would be a good idea for the benefit of random people.    Right now it seems to be focused more on 'how it's going' than 'what it is'.  :)  Maybe something like:
  
== Introduction ==
+
=== Introduction ===
  
 
Due to recent pressing concerns within the project about the legal defensibility of some reverse-engineering practices, the repository and official downloads have been taken down pending a full audit of the project's code.  Only the audited branch of the svn tree is accessible to the general public, and registered developers will continue to move directories into it that are determined to be 'clean' according to an updated IP policy.
 
Due to recent pressing concerns within the project about the legal defensibility of some reverse-engineering practices, the repository and official downloads have been taken down pending a full audit of the project's code.  Only the audited branch of the svn tree is accessible to the general public, and registered developers will continue to move directories into it that are determined to be 'clean' according to an updated IP policy.
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
I'm too shy to go ahead and post it, though.  ;)  What do people think?  --[[User:Winterwing|Winterwing]] 13:23, 9 February 2006 (CET)
 
I'm too shy to go ahead and post it, though.  ;)  What do people think?  --[[User:Winterwing|Winterwing]] 13:23, 9 February 2006 (CET)
 +
 +
Is it just me, or does ''nobody'' know what's going on?  :/  --[[User:Winterwing|Winterwing]] 13:02, 16 February 2006 (CET)

Revision as of 12:02, 16 February 2006

Since this article is linked prominently on the front page, it seems like a concise introduction would be a good idea for the benefit of random people. Right now it seems to be focused more on 'how it's going' than 'what it is'.  :) Maybe something like:

Introduction

Due to recent pressing concerns within the project about the legal defensibility of some reverse-engineering practices, the repository and official downloads have been taken down pending a full audit of the project's code. Only the audited branch of the svn tree is accessible to the general public, and registered developers will continue to move directories into it that are determined to be 'clean' according to an updated IP policy.

This process is expected to take a matter of months. The overall progress will be shown on the project's home page until the audit is complete.

--

I'm too shy to go ahead and post it, though.  ;) What do people think? --Winterwing 13:23, 9 February 2006 (CET)

Is it just me, or does nobody know what's going on?  :/ --Winterwing 13:02, 16 February 2006 (CET)