ea at iol.it
Sun Oct 9 19:49:46 CEST 2005
Ge van Geldorp wrote:
>>From: Emanuele Aliberti
>>Win32 would remain the dominant subsystem. I am not against
>>Win32, that shuold be clear. I simply want to make the tree
>>cleaner (the core in a module, a subsystem a module etsim.).
>The one thing that distinguishes ReactOS from other open source operating
>systems is its application support. There is no other open source OS with
>the number of applications available (potentially :-)) as ReactOS. Take out
>Win32 and what you're left with is an OS which can only run native apps,
>bringing it down (in terms of application support) to the realms of BeOS and
You overread my words, it seems. I definitely need one more class of
English language: Alex, again, says I want μSessions in CSR, which I
twice said I dislike. This means I can't speak English. Period.
>I have no problems with a reorganization which would make Win32 a separate
>entity in the repository, but I do feel rather strongly that the default
>build (and install) should include Win32.
That is exactly what "dominant subsystem" means.
> I'm not sure I like the idea of
>moving it to /trunk level. I thought beginning this year concensus was
>reached on http://www.reactos.org/wiki/index.php/New_Tree_Structure ?
Sorry. I saw the discussion stop and never reopened that page. I assumed
(wrongly) that no consensus was reached about that subject. And never
read the comments by Alex, with whom I mostly disagree.
>Gé van Geldorp.
Really sorry for the noise.
More information about the Ros-dev