[suggestion]3dfx GLIDE™ for Windows - glide2.x , glide3.x

Here you can discuss ReactOS related topics.

Moderator: Moderator Team

hto
Developer
Posts: 2193
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 3:43 pm

Post by hto » Thu Dec 23, 2010 11:40 pm

Developer, Moderator Team, Release Engineer, Site Admin, Test Team, Translation Team, Website Coordinator, … Meritorious Contributor ? :)

Z98
Release Engineer
Posts: 3379
Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 8:16 pm
Contact:

Re: [suggestion]3dfx GLIDE™ for Windows - glide2.x , glide3.

Post by Z98 » Thu Dec 23, 2010 11:58 pm

Okay, this is getting massively off topic.

A final word from me before I drop out of this conversation. We have several people in the community that started out as forum goers or whatever and have obtained trusted positions within the community. They did this by providing assistance and help that the developers valued and they were conferred additional responsibilities. At this point they are fairly well known to the community here and newcomers run into them very quickly. Their names are also highlighted in some way on the forum. If you feel that you have not received your due recognition, then consider the differences in how you contribute compared to how they contribute. While the project appreciates efforts to help it, it should go without saying that there are types of efforts that we appreciate more and thus reward accordingly. This is not to diminish the contribution of those that don't get such public recognition as others, but frankly, you should not need constant accolades to motivate you if you believe in this project.

forart
Posts: 1050
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2004 1:36 pm
Location: Italy
Contact:

Re: [suggestion]3dfx GLIDE™ for Windows - glide2.x , glide3.

Post by forart » Fri Dec 24, 2010 1:45 pm

vicmarcal wrote:Maybe we can create a wikipage where our users can write down their suggestions adding their names to it, and avoiding duplicities, we can use its "talk" page to discuss them, or also the forum. It will be anice way to not forget good 3r party suggestions.
What do you think about this idea?
Yes, a mixup of a wiki and a tracker would be great to manage suggestions (it could be also interesting to have a driven procedure that fits the needs of "the scheme")...
»Forward Agency NPO
In progress we (always) trust.

mrugiero
Posts: 482
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 9:12 am

Re: [suggestion]3dfx GLIDE™ for Windows - glide2.x , glide3.

Post by mrugiero » Sat Dec 25, 2010 10:16 am

forart wrote:
vicmarcal wrote:Maybe we can create a wikipage where our users can write down their suggestions adding their names to it, and avoiding duplicities, we can use its "talk" page to discuss them, or also the forum. It will be anice way to not forget good 3r party suggestions.
What do you think about this idea?
Yes, a mixup of a wiki and a tracker would be great to manage suggestions (it could be also interesting to have a driven procedure that fits the needs of "the scheme")...
I think it might be like follows:
1. the flowchart in that wiki
2. a part which can't be modified by non-devs, where devs (or someone in charge) puts the "semi-approved" ideas (it means, devs will discuss if it will be used, but it seems to be a good idea).
3. a part which can be modified by anyone, with the suggestion.

AND sorry for murdering the english language :P

Z98
Release Engineer
Posts: 3379
Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 8:16 pm
Contact:

Re: [suggestion]3dfx GLIDE™ for Windows - glide2.x , glide3.

Post by Z98 » Sat Dec 25, 2010 5:59 pm

You guys know that's just duplicating the functionality of the forums?

forart
Posts: 1050
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2004 1:36 pm
Location: Italy
Contact:

Re: [suggestion]3dfx GLIDE™ for Windows - glide2.x , glide3.

Post by forart » Sun Dec 26, 2010 2:16 pm

If something like this will be implemented, then we don't need the "Suggestions" section anymore (we could keep feedback, BTW).
»Forward Agency NPO
In progress we (always) trust.

Z98
Release Engineer
Posts: 3379
Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 8:16 pm
Contact:

Re: [suggestion]3dfx GLIDE™ for Windows - glide2.x , glide3.

Post by Z98 » Sun Dec 26, 2010 9:08 pm

This probably would not be implemented.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 2 guests