...linuxgx wrote:I don't believe I said anything critical of the project
linuxgx wrote: I'd be surprised if 1.0 ever come out
Moderator: Moderator Team
Actually there are much thing to be done. For me, sound or video isn't crucial at the moment but to have the majority of programs running.tomleem wrote:If one views the screen shots, one sees that 1.0 is very doable. I look forward to version 1.0 of ReactOS. 8)
I believe I said the project needs MS DirectX working, not that it should only be use for acceleration, thats not even a logical Interpretation of my text.Haos wrote:Yeah... why dont you advise Ms to dump DirectX as it is now ("because its a waste"), and use it only for video acceleration... You cannot be serious...
As am I, I'd love to see Ros reach 1.0 Status.tomleem wrote:If one views the screen shots, one sees that 1.0 is very doable. I look forward to version 1.0 of ReactOS. 8)
So you state thatWe need more centralized focus, and reactX is a waste, accelerate video with DX should be the focus.
meansreactX is a waste
andthe project needs MS DirectX working
meansaccelerate video with DX should be the focus
?not that it should only be use for acceleration
Illegal things are illegal. We not supposed to promote such actions, so please watch what you write here.well technically that falls on the end user. I have no problem hitting agree and never reading as I have a copy of every pc game I own.
linuxgx you need to realize that, while what you say makes sense from a strategy point of view, most of the developers probably aren't coding from a unified strategy point of view, they're just working on what they like doing, such is the nature of opensource coding, and always will be.linuxgx wrote: Dont get me wrong I'd like to see the whole NT system cloned at some point, but why does that mean that everything must be done at the same time?
My understanding is that there is only one developer really working on it, try telling him to stop doing what he loves so more 'vital' things can receive his unenthusiastic attention.linuxgx wrote: I just dont see ReactX as vital at the moment.
There is more to windows software than MS's software. Or do you think that MS would try and force software vendors to gain 'permission' to use their API's and thereby force them to put a 'windows only' clause in their license agreement... that would actually ruin them... not to mention being completely in violation of anti-trust laws.linuxgx wrote:I mean you do realize that MS is simply going license all of its software for windows only, the moment we gain any marketshare?
Users browsing this forum: DotBot [Crawler], Semrush [Bot] and 2 guests