¿What happened here?

[jonaspm]

https://code.google.com/p/windows-packa ... ail?id=360

Come on, tell me this is not true...

[Z98]

I don't recall any request being made to us.

[EmuandCo]

Maybe in the German e.V. mailbox... will check @ home later.

[Blackcrack]

hmmm... it's giving peoples who believe to reactos
hey be happy about it and ask they are and tell they
are they can help on RAPPs, hey, why not ..

don't judge/condemn it, be more intelligent, use it !

if it's tested software and it works.. but one condition/requirement, 101% working together and feedback about
and about errors and so on..
so, kick it not away, use it ..

best regards
Blacky

[Webunny]

hmmm... it's giving peoples who believe to reactos
hey be happy about it and ask they are and tell they
are they can help on RAPPs, hey, why not ..

don't judge/condemn it, be more intelligent, use it !

if it's tested software and it works.. but one condition/requirement, 101% working together and feedback about
and about errors and so on..
so, kick it not away, use it ..

best regards
Blacky

That's exactly what I have been saying on several occasions too, at least as a general rule. But you better not continue in this direction, because pointing this out makes them 'informally avoid your posts', or something to that effect. Or worse, they'll lock the topic (always a good thing to do, if one wants an opinion you don't agree with to go away). Nobody forces anyone to read anything of course, let alone respond, but, that's simply not enough. No, locking is the answer. So I feel obliged to point out, that, if you say things that 'irritate' them (such as the sentence in bold), and they feel they can't 'convince' you otherwise (of their own view, thus), you might get this particular treatment as well.

[Blackcrack]

best regards
blacky

[EmuandCo]

While we are talking about treatment... I will not continue to argue with your carved in stone standpoint. Not anymore, as Z98 already said, we don't care anymore, because it's worthless. But one thing is not being ignored... thread hijacking to flame again and again aggainst OUR carved in stone standpoint bein supported by 2/3 of the community and all devs! This is the first warning, which I normally speak out without setting a warning level at your account. Hold your horses in here, or you will get the real thing aka 2 warnings and then...

[ external image ]

[Webunny]

While we are talking about treatment... I will not continue to argue with your carved in stone standpoint. Not anymore, as Z98 already said, we don't care anymore, because it's worthless. But one thing is not being ignored... thread hijacking to flame again and again aggainst OUR carved in stone standpoint bein supported by 2/3 of the community and all devs! This is the first warning, which I normally speak out without setting a warning level at your account. Hold your horses in here, or you will get the real thing aka 2 warnings and then...

I see...'thread hijacking'...so, if I make a new thread about that subject, there is no problem?

[EmuandCo]

Feel free to. Please inside Off Topic

[Webunny]

Feel free to. Please inside Off Topic

ok. Will do.

[jonaspm]

So... EmuandCo, did you find the request of inclusion?

[EmuandCo]

Maybe I am blind, but... nope.

[Webunny]

Maybe I am blind, but... nope.

Maybe he send it to yet another, maybe lesser (or not at all) used email anymore?

[dark]

So... EmuandCo, did you find the request of inclusion?

I wouldn't get your hopes up. While it is open source, they appear to have attached an app store to their software in order to make profits. It is unlikely they would want to deal with supporting users who don't read things like ROS is unstable for everyday use after they would publicly associate themselves.

[jonaspm]

hopefully they'll send the request again here: pr@reactos.org