\0/oswetto wrote:fulup, THANK YOU!
Samba-tng work!!!
ALL GOLDENAPPS are tested!!!
Thanks guys!
Btw, the regression found has been set as a blocker of 0.3.15
Moderator: Moderator Team
\0/oswetto wrote:fulup, THANK YOU!
Samba-tng work!!!
ALL GOLDENAPPS are tested!!!
Now that's a NEWSvicmarcal wrote:So next step:
Waiting for the RC based on the revision choosen with the patches that fixes the regressions.
That shouldn't take too long
Thanks, some patches are being done based on the results.CSRedRat wrote:On my request re-checking the ReactOS project - a large report by PVS-Studio (Static Code Analyzer): http://www.viva64.com/en/b/0192/
First check: http://www.viva64.com/en/a/0076/
Andrey_Karpov wrote:The PVS-Studio demo version will be insufficient to examine all the 4887 warnings. However, we are friendly to open-source projects: if the ReactOS developers ask us, we'll give them our tool for free for a while.
Code: Select all
....
for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
/* The signs must match. */
if (src->channel[i].type != src->channel[i].type) {
return FALSE;
....
}
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Google [Bot] and 43 guests