[Official]Testing request to the ReactOS Community

Here you can discuss ReactOS related topics.

Moderator: Moderator Team

vicmarcal
Test Team
Posts: 2733
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 12:35 pm

Re: [Official]Testing request to the ReactOS Community

Post by vicmarcal »

oswetto wrote:fulup, THANK YOU!

Samba-tng work!!!

ALL GOLDENAPPS are tested!!!
\0/
Thanks guys!
Btw, the regression found has been set as a blocker of 0.3.15
zehnvor
Posts: 245
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 3:20 pm

Re: [Official]Testing request to the ReactOS Community

Post by zehnvor »

you should test Notepad lite again, after CORE-7027 seems to be fixed
- even if it is not the target revision
oswetto
Posts: 109
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 10:43 pm

Re: [Official]Testing request to the ReactOS Community

Post by oswetto »

r58614: Gs Notepade lite work very well.
vicmarcal
Test Team
Posts: 2733
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 12:35 pm

Re: [Official]Testing request to the ReactOS Community

Post by vicmarcal »

Thanks guys!
The testing have shown that we didn't lose compatibility with the Golden Apps :)
Just a slightly regression which at first sight was introduced by a memory manager but that ended being a real bug in other past of the code which was revealed thanks to the memory manager commit.
ThFabba did a great job finding the reason and fixing it.
So next step:
Waiting for the RC based on the revision choosen with the patches that fixes the regressions.
That shouldn't take too long :)
fred02
Posts: 551
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 5:54 pm

Re: [Official]Testing request to the ReactOS Community

Post by fred02 »

vicmarcal wrote:So next step:
Waiting for the RC based on the revision choosen with the patches that fixes the regressions.
That shouldn't take too long :)
Now that's a NEWS :!:
CSRedRat
Posts: 71
Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 6:43 am

Re: [Official]Testing request to the ReactOS Community

Post by CSRedRat »

0.4.1 released! http://www.reactos.org/wiki/ChangeLog-0.3.15
And has been start testing 0.4.1! ReactOS beta!!!
P.S. I'm have UTC+6 (23:59 01.04 :))
PascalDragon
Posts: 123
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 7:34 pm

Re: [Official]Testing request to the ReactOS Community

Post by PascalDragon »

You do know that the 0.4 series is still considered Alpha? At least if nothing changed since I last looked at the roadmap...

Regards,
Sven
Free Pascal compiler developer
CSRedRat
Posts: 71
Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 6:43 am

Re: [Official]Testing request to the ReactOS Community

Post by CSRedRat »

On my request re-checking the ReactOS project - a large report by PVS-Studio (Static Code Analyzer): http://www.viva64.com/en/b/0192/
First check: http://www.viva64.com/en/a/0076/
vicmarcal
Test Team
Posts: 2733
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 12:35 pm

Re: [Official]Testing request to the ReactOS Community

Post by vicmarcal »

CSRedRat wrote:On my request re-checking the ReactOS project - a large report by PVS-Studio (Static Code Analyzer): http://www.viva64.com/en/b/0192/
First check: http://www.viva64.com/en/a/0076/
Thanks, some patches are being done based on the results. ;)
wildschwein
Posts: 420
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 1:13 pm

Re: [Official]Testing request to the ReactOS Community

Post by wildschwein »

Did you accept the offer to use PVS for free, for a certain while ?

I read the article about PVS and ROS and i was really astonished !
Z98
Release Engineer
Posts: 3379
Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 8:16 pm
Contact:

Re: [Official]Testing request to the ReactOS Community

Post by Z98 »

They made no such offer.
User avatar
Black_Fox
Posts: 1584
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2008 9:44 pm
Location: Czechia

Re: [Official]Testing request to the ReactOS Community

Post by Black_Fox »

Actually, they did :!:
http://reactos.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=12441 --- this is a verbatim copy of http://www.viva64.com/en/b/0192/ so it is valid and legit
Andrey_Karpov wrote:The PVS-Studio demo version will be insufficient to examine all the 4887 warnings. However, we are friendly to open-source projects: if the ReactOS developers ask us, we'll give them our tool for free for a while.
Z98
Release Engineer
Posts: 3379
Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 8:16 pm
Contact:

Re: [Official]Testing request to the ReactOS Community

Post by Z98 »

Note the "for a while" part. There was some contact in the past, but the price they proposed was at levels of corporate licensing.
User avatar
Black_Fox
Posts: 1584
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2008 9:44 pm
Location: Czechia

Re: [Official]Testing request to the ReactOS Community

Post by Black_Fox »

I know, wildschwein also mentions it. Well, is the time-limited offer suitable to at least for devs generating and saving all the 4500 warnings somewhere for fixing them later when the offer times out?
wildschwein
Posts: 420
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 1:13 pm

Re: [Official]Testing request to the ReactOS Community

Post by wildschwein »

Read the article, and see what really "funny" bugs PVS found. Yeah, devs are also humans, this should not be any criticism - BEWARE ! you know that i bow me deep to EVERY dev, because you are all so great and do "THE PROJECT" of the 21.century...

Code: Select all

 ....
  for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
    /* The signs must match. */
    if (src->channel[i].type != src->channel[i].type) {
      return FALSE;
  ....
}
Why not "borrow" Full Version of PVS for a while, analyse ROS code, save results, give it back - and work with the error-list from PVS.

PVS would like to help ROS - in my opinion
Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Google [Bot] and 43 guests