Page 2 of 2

I second that

Posted: Tue Jul 12, 2005 12:16 pm
by chorns
I second that

Posted: Tue Jul 12, 2005 9:26 pm
by Dr. Fred
Alex wanted to do such kind of things, if he becomes kernel coordinator.

Posted: Tue Jul 12, 2005 11:40 pm
by inocentPC
well, get in touch with Alex and see if the project will move faster. please, don't consider me a trouble maker, an arogant, etc, that talks/barks instead of doing something good.

1. Microsoft will never fear this project, and that's because of the way it's organized today.

2. Microsoft will never have to work aganist you right now, because ROS speed is so slow, you hardly can see it. again the way you are organized.

3. "divide and conquer" doesn't work to ruin ROS, because there's not much unity.

please, do something.

with love and respect,

InocentPC (in PC's etc, but not naiv)

Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2005 9:47 pm
by GreatLord
Reactos are being devloping pretty fast, and we are using so mush freetime we can for reactos. But people do not see the huge changes and implement of new api. They often only notes why can I not run my program. why is not directx support inplace. like that. We are devloping alot of underlying stuff. when it is done we will see basic network support and other nice cindy in ReactOS. Some devloper are working on PNP, USB and other nice cool stuff. We can not force people to work on something they do not like. It is a opensource project.

What the users can't see!

Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2005 12:40 am
by Maribo63_4
GreatLord wrote:Reactos are being devloping pretty fast, and we are using so mush freetime we can for reactos. But people do not see the huge changes and implement of new api. They often only notes why can I not run my program. why is not directx support inplace. like that. We are devloping alot of underlying stuff. when it is done we will see basic network support and other nice cindy in ReactOS. Some devloper are working on PNP, USB and other nice cool stuff. We can not force people to work on something they do not like. It is a opensource project.
So it is, there is so much implemented in reactOS!

I saw the source of 2.4 or 2.2, it wasn't able to comunicate via network, but 60% of the network was implemented. And I think the API (and kernel) it's the same like the network, the basic is implemented, but not enought to run (highquality-)programms! :!: