Page 1 of 1
Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 5:32 am
is there a way to change the number of workspaces? i am virtualizing ROS and simply have no use for the other 3 workspaces =]
Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 3:50 pm
i agree, IMHO it would be useful have the ability to select how many spaces to use (1 - no other virtual desktops - , 2, 3 or more)
i think this could be a nice feature, if the developers agree (i know there are more important things now)
sorry for my bad english
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 10:11 pm
I believe that this will work that way in the future, but that is very low priority.
Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 1:20 pm
the reactos explorer is from 2003 and the developers are changing
other parts first because it already runs relaible on reactos since 0.2.0
(not really good then) and some
parts of its incompleteness lies in shell32.dll(if you dont like file,
dir,cd... icons in windows >95 or reactos change them with resource
hacker 3.4 ) and the other in uninterested people and in the use
Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 1:33 pm
mulit choice desktop are posible both in reactos and windows.
we will change some part later, letting the user desdie if they want this featuer or not. for now we do not doing any big change to current explorer until the new one works
Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 5:19 pm
Much better thing to burn time on, would be IMHO multiple window stations on one one computer using multiple mices and keyboards. This need pretty stable USB support. What's the status of USB?
Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 8:14 am
etko wrote:Much better thing to burn time on, would be IMHO multiple window stations on one one computer using multiple mices and keyboards. This need pretty stable USB support. What's the status of USB?
Not good enough to do that
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 2:50 am
Yes, this is serious, some manufactorers (incl Intel) already excluded ps/2 connectors for keyboad and mouse from new motherbords. BTW, from their side that was an awful decision.
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 4:34 pm
QD wrote:This is telling, isn't it? Sorry if this is bit offtopic.
For me personally, I'm just confused as to the point you're trying to make.