Page 1 of 4
ReactOS svg logo
Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 9:27 am
by ROSFan
edit:
-Fully vectorized (best quality for resizing but 839 and 793 KB)
http://www.seanserver.com/~againstgates ... vereinf.7z
http://www.seanserver.com/~againstgates ... vereinf.7z
-Let the Ball not vectorized (bad quality for resizing but 310 and 350 KB)
http://www.seanserver.com/~againstgates ... &raster.7z
http://www.seanserver.com/~againstgates ... &raster.7z
older Versions:
http://www.seanserver.com/~againstgates ... s_logo1.7z
with text:
http://www.seanserver.com/~againstgates ... thtext1.7z
text only:
http://www.seanserver.com/~againstgates ... xt_only.7z
NOTE: the files require Inkscape greater or equal 0.45 which support the blur filter
Where can I find the ReactOS Font to complete the logo?
Best regards
edit:
There is another file, but it is over 7 MB's big (decompressed):
http://svn.reactos.org/viewcvs/reactos/ ... media/art/
additionally the svgz file is not error-free downloadable
edit:
15.08.2007 :links updated
Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 10:26 am
by geertvdijk
Well thats quite a good copy of the original, in SVG

Don't know about the font, though...
Keep on going

Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 10:52 am
by mvent2
Nice work!

ReactOS font appears to be "Century Gothic".
Regards,
Mvent2
Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 11:40 am
by ROSFan
Thanks,
edit:
It is not really the same as Century Gothic but nearly
Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 12:06 pm
by mvent2
ROSFan wrote:Thanks,
edit:
It is not really the same as Century Gothic but nearly
I couldn't find a more similar font

Also try to just draw it with lines if you can since Century Gothic isn't a standard font so not everyone will have it.
Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 1:01 pm
by ROSFan
Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 1:49 pm
by mvent2
Yes you need that white glow

Other than that excellent job!

It would be perfect if it weren't for the fact that not every computer has Century Gothic on it
Edit: I love the fact that your site is called "gateshater"

Re: ReactOS svg logo is here!
Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 2:46 pm
by mf
*cough*
http://svn.reactos.org/viewcvs/reactos/ ... media/art/
Age: 13 months
The font is AvantGarde Bk Bt, btw.
Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 3:02 pm
by ROSFan

:oops::oops::oops::oops::oops::oops::oops::oops::oops::oops:
*cough*
The file seems to be damaged
however,
I made the white glow, but maybe you need inkscape 0.45 to open it, because this Version support blurring
Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 3:06 pm
by mf
It seems that the online subversion repository breaks the file. See if you can get it using tortoisesvn.
Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 4:15 pm
by ROSFan
...
This tortoisesvn-msi Version seems not to be supported on my old-windows Partition which I use once a month
I found and downloaded the AvantGarde Bk Bt font, but the "R" and "s" are different on my Computer, too.
Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 6:59 pm
by Cristan
Good work! This version is
way better than the official one. The official one is over two and a half MB large (as svgz still 1.8MB), and neither works in firefox or in Wikipedia. Also: good work on the letters! As far as I can see they are completely the same! I would stick with this, because right now, you don't have to have any fonts installed to view the svg.
I've uploaded both
the official PNG logo as
your SVG version on Wikipedia. You can compare them pretty good there: the differences are minimal. The official one has for example more blank space around the image. Also, the line surrounding the atom are a bit smaller. There is also a very weird bug with the height of your image (also in Firefox; I don't have a clue where that comes from). Perhaps if you could fix this, the
ReactOS article could start using your SVG logo!
Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 8:12 pm
by ROSFan
I'll see what I can do. I created it with Inkscape. Height bug fixed right.

Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 9:03 pm
by ROSFan
What surroundig line you mean? When I place the svg over the png I can't see any such eye-catching differences. Maybe you mean thinner?
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 1:06 am
by Cristan
ROSFan wrote:What surroundig line you mean? When I place the svg over the png I can't see any such eye-catching differences. Maybe you mean thinner?
I know it isn't eye cathing. And yes, I meant thinner.