Page 1 of 1

FAT Licensing

Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 6:16 pm
by PurpleGurl
How will we handle the issue of LFN-related FAT licenses? We do not want a suit.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_Alloc ... _licensing

Re: FAT Licensing

Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 8:01 pm
by Haos

Re: FAT Licensing

Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 8:06 pm
by Murmur
any downside to full FAT vs normal FAT?

Re: FAT Licensing

Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 8:25 pm
by Yaraslau
It sounds nice. By the way, the author promised to release "small portions of the specification on e-fs.org.uk" (he meant EFS filesystem). No info there. What's wrong? Did I miss something?

Re: FAT Licensing

Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 10:07 pm
by Haos
Its his new project, i presume.

Re: FAT Licensing

Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 10:23 pm
by SomeGuy
I wouldn't worry about those (rightfully invalid) patents. By the time ReactOS hits 1.0 they will be long expired :)