Page 3 of 6

Re: Progress to 0.3.8 and beyond...

Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:20 am
by Apal
cmoibenlepro wrote:Then use a date much further in the future (e.g. May 09), so no questions would be asked.
I think that a 3-month (or maybe 4-month) period is a good one. 2 months is not adequate.
I hope though to see 0.4.0 coming out before summer.

Re: Progress to 0.3.8 and beyond...

Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2009 10:15 am
by Ged
cmoibenlepro wrote:Why don't you remove the "with an earliest projected release date being January, 2009. " from the frontpage? It only confuses people.
I'm sure people aren't that stupid.
It uses the word 'earliest' which translates to 'it will not be released before this date, but may be released after'
We have however, been hitting most of the release dates of recent.
cmoibenlepro wrote: Then use a date much further in the future (e.g. May 09), so no questions would be asked.
Then that would be a lie.

There are a myriad of reasons as to why we aim for a 2 month release cycle. Search the forums and the mailing lists, I'm not about go through this again.

Re: Progress to 0.3.8 and beyond...

Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2009 10:00 am
by nute
How far away is implementation of logins? ReactOS asks for an administrator password when it is installed, but it doesn't seem to use it.

How is FsRtl which is being worked on by Schweitzer coming along?

There is one obvious Firefox bug left, but it seems to be working much better. The bug can be seen when the advertisements on the left
side of the main Reactos site page are scrolled up and down.

Why has the number of virtual desktops been reduced from four down to two?

What will be the difference between 0.3.7 and 0.3.8 other than the firefox fixes?

Is the memory manager getting attention?

Perhaps a changes list could be maintained with trunk so people can see as new releases come what exactly is changing.

Will there for sure be a 0.3.9 or not?

Re: Progress to 0.3.8 and beyond...

Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2009 10:07 am
by Apal
nute wrote: Why has the number of virtual desktops been reduced from four down to two?

What will be the difference between 0.3.7 and 0.3.8 other than the firefox fixes?

Perhaps a changes list could be maintained with trunk so people can see as new releases come what exactly is changing.

Hehe I like the first question! (a...second change is to support Acrobat Reader 5, 5.05, 5.1 and 6. I opened successfully pdf files). Also Foxit Reader etc...
Well this was a funny answer because as we all know, this ain't about only which apps run but what is fixed inside mostly :)

As for the second question, please visit the wiki. We have a changelog for 0.3.8 release there.

Re: Progress to 0.3.8 and beyond...

Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2009 11:50 am
by Haos
nute wrote:How far away is implementation of logins? ReactOS asks for an administrator password when it is installed, but it doesn't seem to use it.
Nothing has been done with it since i joined in.
How is FsRtl which is being worked on by Schweitzer coming along?
FsRtl is feeling fine. Still plenty left to do.
There is one obvious Firefox bug left, but it seems to be working much better. The bug can be seen when the advertisements on the left
side of the main Reactos site page are scrolled up and down.
Bug -> Bugzilla
Why has the number of virtual desktops been reduced from four down to two?
IF you CONSIDER "the number of virtual desktops reduced" == Bug THEN report it to bugzilla.
What will be the difference between 0.3.7 and 0.3.8 other than the firefox fixes?
All the changes are in changelog.
Is the memory manager getting attention?
Not at the moment.
Perhaps a changes list could be maintained with trunk so people can see as new releases come what exactly is changing.
SVN Changelog works fine.
Will there for sure be a 0.3.9 or not?
No one knows for sure.

Re: Progress to 0.3.8 and beyond...

Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2009 2:14 pm
by forart
Apal wrote:Hehe I like the first question! (a...second change is to support Acrobat Reader 5, 5.05, 5.1 and 6. I opened successfully pdf files). Also Foxit Reader etc...
Sumatra PDF instead.

Re: Progress to 0.3.8 and beyond...

Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2009 2:38 pm
by Apal
forart wrote:
Apal wrote:Hehe I like the first question! (a...second change is to support Acrobat Reader 5, 5.05, 5.1 and 6. I opened successfully pdf files). Also Foxit Reader etc...
Sumatra PDF instead.
Yes I know it works for a long time, but I don't like it. I prefer the other 2 instead.

Re: Progress to 0.3.8 and beyond...

Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2009 2:46 pm
by vicmarcal
Sumatra pdf has been working since 0.3.6

Re: Progress to 0.3.8 and beyond...

Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2009 6:46 pm
by Haos
Foxit is still much faster. Sumatra is bit slow to me.

Re: Progress to 0.3.8 and beyond...

Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:02 pm
by GoBusto
cia.vc wrote:Commit by cfinck on ros-branch-0_3_8 :: r39184 /:
Branch for the 0.3.8 release

Re: Progress to 0.3.8 and beyond...

Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 1:35 am
by gonzoMD
So Everyone can see, 0.3.8 comes at january. Its a proof that all this senseless discussions about complaining when it's released were just wasting time.
Great Work!

Re: Progress to 0.3.8 and beyond...

Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 12:42 pm
by BOT_ev
[ros-dev] 0.3.8 Test Season has started :-)

show details 1:57 AM (10 hours ago)

Hello everybody (and especially the testers),

After nobody complained about branching 0.3.8 from trunk now, I took the
initiative today and prepared the branch with our usual customizations and
hacks.

It's now again the time for application testing. Therefore I uploaded Boot
CD and Live CD of the current branch to http://reactos.colinfinck.de/
Please test them, especially with the applications in Downloader, and write
your results to http://www.reactos.org/wiki/index.php/Tests_for_0.3.8

I especially write this now, because we want the release to be ready some
days before FOSDEM.
Andrew wants to start burning the CDs for FOSDEM soon, so it would be great
if we could get the entire release done till *next Monday*.

Best regards,

Colin
So be cool, 0.3.8 is coming.

Re: Progress to 0.3.8 and beyond...

Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 10:12 pm
by DukeNukemCZ
Im will be very happy for some new Applications/Games compatibility screenshots :) its was not updated from ROS 0.3.4.

Re: Progress to 0.3.8 and beyond...

Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2009 12:13 am
by vicmarcal
DukeNukem:

Then download the pre-Release and take some screenshoots ;)

Re: Progress to 0.3.8 and beyond...

Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2009 2:50 am
by DukeNukemCZ
vicmarcal wrote:DukeNukem:

Then download the pre-Release and take some screenshoots ;)
Have Win7 Beta now
SATAII Drive, NTFS, Quadcore, HD4870X2 (Dual GPU), USB mouse, USB keyboard...

For sharp go can be any issue?

Last time i was tryed from WMware (back on Vista) but there was some ugly graphical issue.

true is i was expecting less moronic answer, like you can do if you are tester ;)