So how much money did you make working for Casper?GvG wrote: I didn't stand up to Casper because I agreed with him. Never made a secret about that. In fact, up to this day I still agree with the actions Casper took.
Gé
Thanks,
James
Moderator: Moderator Team
Uhm, that would be exactly 0.00 Euro, which might have something to do with the fact that he never hired me. Not for something ReactOS/Windows-compatible-OS related, not for anything else.jimtabor wrote:So how much money did you make working for Casper?
That is so funny! What make you think it is a conspiracy? Did I say it was?GvG wrote:Uhm, that would be exactly 0.00 Euro, which might have something to do with the fact that he never hired me. Not for something ReactOS/Windows-compatible-OS related, not for anything else.jimtabor wrote:So how much money did you make working for Casper?
You keep insisting that there was some dark conspiracy to steal your code and that Casper and myself were part of that conspiracy. Usually, conspiracy theorists offer at least some proof, but so far you have only come up with a link to Caspers company website (which, by the way, doesn't contain any info about a Windows-compatible-OS). Oh noes, Casper owns a company! Surely he must be Evil! I'll let you in on a little secret: I run my own company too! Two people, both running their own little Evil Companies, and they agreed on the copyright issue! That can't be a coincidence, can it? Surely that's all the proof anyone would need to recognize that there was a Dark Conspiracy?
In case the sarcasm in the last paragraph went over your head: please provide evidence or stop accusing people.
Gé
To me, this sounds like you're claiming there was a conspiracy.jimtabor wrote:This is an analyses of the events accruing year prior, days before and days after the audit started. It is a subject of understanding that more than two groups where working for self interests for some type of financial gain.
Need to read it again. It is a subject of understanding that more than two groups where working for self interests for some type of financial gain Hum? I did not see your name anywhere in there. I never specified the groups did I?GvG wrote: Can we stop playing word games now and get back to the issue: when are you going to show evidence that I was part of one of "two groups working for self interests for some type of financial gain"?
Wish I could say the same. Still waiting for the answer to my repeated question "please provide evidence that I gained financial benefit from ReactOS (or from leaving the project)". Of course I'm not surprised that you haven't provided such evidence, since it cannot exist. I would have had a lot more respect for you if you just admitted you made a mistake instead of playing silly word games.jimtabor wrote:You have already answered my questions.
Well, i can't understand so mutch: where's the problem ?jimtabor wrote:Money was the key word here.
Get help, Jim. By help, I mean professional help. $200/hour shrinks. I'm sure they can remove the ghosts you are seeing...jimtabor wrote:So how much money did you make working for Casper?GvG wrote: I didn't stand up to Casper because I agreed with him. Never made a secret about that. In fact, up to this day I still agree with the actions Casper took.
Gé
Thanks,
James
Two remarks, here:Most what is left is C files that source cannot be determined. Ie cannot find author or find any matching sources.
Most of the suspected asm ones were under a valid license from Microsoft to use legally use just they were tagged wrong.
So, "integrity" is a word that you should refrain from using. You have made the demonstration that you want to have non-GPLed code inside, at any cost. And the reason one is known: The name is "20 millions dollars, baby".the integrity clause of GPL
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 71 guests