WinLogon
Moderator: Moderator Team
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2004 1:12 am
- Contact:
WinLogon
Winlogon needs to be implimented so that react os can be a multi user system,
not multi user like win9x, but like windows NT 4.0/2000 login screen idea.
not multi user like win9x, but like windows NT 4.0/2000 login screen idea.
We need a react OS Update. How would we get by wih out it.
Re: WinLogon
Yes that's a good start then it's just to add Terminal Service to make it a real multiuser OSReact_dude wrote:Winlogon needs to be implimented so that react os can be a multi user system,
not multi user like win9x, but like windows NT 4.0/2000 login screen idea.
-
- Posts: 198
- Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 5:47 pm
- Location: Duesseldorf, Germany
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 198
- Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 5:47 pm
- Location: Duesseldorf, Germany
- Contact:
WinXp contains a different USER32 model to prevent multiple logins. The XP model supports one local login and one terminal session. ROS could make it more user freindly, akin to Advanced Server 2000 or 2003 where multiple terminal sessions at the least could co-exist. ROS would sink a small niche market of terminal users that Microsoft relies on for a steady flow of income. I personally think the terminal server is as close to mainframe as Microsoft ever will get before they head out to pasture.
*************************************
Go Huskers!
Go Huskers!
-
- Posts: 198
- Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 5:47 pm
- Location: Duesseldorf, Germany
- Contact:
Thats 'fast user switching', and do you notice its VERY slow (its painfully slow on my 1900+ Athlon XP with 512 megs of ram)?
On Linux I can be logged in twice (or more) and go at very good speeds (one can even be in a chroot environment, so it doesn't share ANY resources with the other user since it would have a different version).
On Linux I can be logged in twice (or more) and go at very good speeds (one can even be in a chroot environment, so it doesn't share ANY resources with the other user since it would have a different version).
"People do have a real life." -- w3seek
Guess that means I'm not a person
Guess that means I'm not a person

-
- Posts: 198
- Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 5:47 pm
- Location: Duesseldorf, Germany
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 198
- Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 5:47 pm
- Location: Duesseldorf, Germany
- Contact:
is there any point to enabling to people to login at the local computer?
i mean, i thought windows xp was very neat that i can do that, but i don't recall once in the years of using it that i've actually *needed* to do it, i showed some people to show you can, but, really, is there any need?
allow multiple people to login remotely i see a point for on the otherhand
btw, on my old PIII 800 with 256 i was curious and messed around with 2 users logged in, noticed no slow down, but the only times i used it was when i was messing around.
maybe an idea would be to let people login but as a console only? any point in that? guessing it would use less resources than have 2 desktops loaded in memory
i mean, i thought windows xp was very neat that i can do that, but i don't recall once in the years of using it that i've actually *needed* to do it, i showed some people to show you can, but, really, is there any need?
allow multiple people to login remotely i see a point for on the otherhand
btw, on my old PIII 800 with 256 i was curious and messed around with 2 users logged in, noticed no slow down, but the only times i used it was when i was messing around.
maybe an idea would be to let people login but as a console only? any point in that? guessing it would use less resources than have 2 desktops loaded in memory
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests