0.4.0 goals
Moderator: Moderator Team
0.4.0 goals
How does everyone feel about the goals in 0.4.0?
IMHO I think that some of them could wait later, and focus on more important features.
DHCP Server -> Easily use 3rd party for now
Remote Desktop -> 3rd party (VNC)
Telnet Server -> 3rd party (cygwin/ssh)
I think cloning core features would be more important such as SMB, NTFS, WDM. Then we could dual boot on real hardware and get things rolling.
Any opinions?
IMHO I think that some of them could wait later, and focus on more important features.
DHCP Server -> Easily use 3rd party for now
Remote Desktop -> 3rd party (VNC)
Telnet Server -> 3rd party (cygwin/ssh)
I think cloning core features would be more important such as SMB, NTFS, WDM. Then we could dual boot on real hardware and get things rolling.
Any opinions?
We always have http://www.kpym.com/ for ssh. At least that is something not requiring cygwin to work.
Re: 0.4.0 goals
DHCP server will be included in the future.digiboy wrote:How does everyone feel about the goals in 0.4.0?
IMHO I think that some of them could wait later, and focus on more important features.
DHCP Server -> Easily use 3rd party for now
Remote Desktop -> 3rd party (VNC)
Telnet Server -> 3rd party (cygwin/ssh)
I think cloning core features would be more important such as SMB, NTFS, WDM. Then we could dual boot on real hardware and get things rolling.
Any opinions?
VNC -Client is already working, just install UltraVNC, server will work in time, we need people who wants to debug and return info to the devs. We have a RDP-client on it's way, (probably one or two monts away).
Telnet-server will also be included in the furure.
All these are important stuff and will come and probably sooner then later.
How about SAMBA-client & server, Clipboard, Printing-system, local security, login, directx, not to mention stability and compatibility.
Re: 0.4.0 goals
Samba-TNG client, clipboard, gina logon and directx (draw and later d3d) are work in progress and will come in near future too.Jaix wrote:How about SAMBA-client & server, Clipboard, Printing-system, local security, login, directx, not to mention stability and compatibility.
I'd like better compatibility with Qemu. tcpip.sys keeps crashing after a very short time when running in qemu, but i don't know if this is a bug in the tcp/ip stack or in the LAN driver. I don't think it's a problem with qemu, because debian sid runs fine in Qemu for hours.
Surprisingly, i can't get ReactOS to work in VMware on Linux. The installation works fine but it it'll crash with a bluescreen when trying to run it. It works with VMware on Windows though, and it's surprisingly stable )
Surprisingly, i can't get ReactOS to work in VMware on Linux. The installation works fine but it it'll crash with a bluescreen when trying to run it. It works with VMware on Windows though, and it's surprisingly stable )
Re: 0.4.0 goals
That all sounds good to meJaix wrote: DHCP server will be included in the future.
VNC -Client is already working, just install UltraVNC, server will work in time, we need people who wants to debug and return info to the devs. We have a RDP-client on it's way, (probably one or two monts away).
Telnet-server will also be included in the furure.
All these are important stuff and will come and probably sooner then later.
How about SAMBA-client & server, Clipboard, Printing-system, local security, login, directx, not to mention stability and compatibility.
Just wanted to make sure priorities are where the majority would like them.
But then again, with many developers working I guess it really doesn't matter. Just plug stuff into the main trunk once it's working.
Re: 0.4.0 goals
Yes, isn't that nice!frik85 wrote:Samba-TNG client, clipboard, gina logon and directx (draw and later d3d) are work in progress and will come in near future too.Jaix wrote:How about SAMBA-client & server, Clipboard, Printing-system, local security, login, directx, not to mention stability and compatibility.
Re: 0.4.0 goals
Exactly, I wasn't opposed to you, just informing you about that those stuff will probably come before 0.4 (unless 0.4 is coming really soon).digiboy wrote:That all sounds good to me
Just wanted to make sure priorities are where the majority would like them.
But then again, with many developers working I guess it really doesn't matter. Just plug stuff into the main trunk once it's working.
-
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 3:38 pm
NTFS _is_ supported on Linux. Advanced features like rights management, compression, encryption etc. don't work, but the basics (e. g. reading, writing, creating and deleting files) do with the ntfs-3g driver. However i don't think it's necessary for ReactOS. If one really needs NTFS, he can use the driver from Windows.Ferret-Simpson wrote:NTFS isn't even supported on the *NIX's yet.
Who said anything about ReactOS using NTFS-3G? If anything, (imo) ReactOS NTFS support should be based on Linux-NTFS (No messy FUSE crap).Andre wrote:NTFS read/write support is in the roadmap for version 0.5
So I guess we shouldn't worry about that right now.
Then, while devolping 0.4.0 the ntfs-3g can be also
further developed, and to be ported after the 0.4.0
release.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Trendiction [Bot] and 20 guests