Page 2 of 3

Posted: Thu May 18, 2006 8:43 pm
by frik85
I am surprised that several people submitted only the application name but no further information.

e.g. "AnalogX DLL Archive": ... &group=109

... but no further information (app version and compatibility test reports) :?

I though, that the submit process is easy to understand and that the first submit page, is only one of three parts.

You have to follow the instructions on screen (or on an app page click "Submit application version" and later click "Submit Compatibility Test Report").

Application entries without compatibility data do not make much sense.

Please post suggestions, ideas so that I can improve the interface. Where do you have troubles, what is confusing, etc.

Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 3:33 pm
by andreasm
Reactos 0.3 is coming!
Can anyone of you estimate when version 0.3 will be out?

Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 4:35 pm
by frik85
I have splitted up this thread and moved the compatibility db related posts to a new thread called "Compatibility Database - suggestions":

(and I have answered to all posts)

Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 10:53 pm
by GreatLord
When 0.3.0 who knows, it is branch and we are working on getting all lnpw regress fix and some other smaller bug be solv

Posted: Sun May 21, 2006 7:42 pm
by temarez
Won't audit process first reach 100% before 0.3 branch release?

Posted: Sun May 21, 2006 7:55 pm
by GreatLord
No it will not, it will soon get slower the audlt process.

Posted: Mon May 22, 2006 2:28 am
by Coviti
frik85: The new Support Database looks great!

Posted: Fri Jun 02, 2006 5:08 pm
by cmoibenlepro

Posted: Fri Jun 02, 2006 5:52 pm
by Sirmatto
cmoibenlepro wrote:0.3 has been bumped to RC1 :) ... 12323.html
Good deal, hopefully the bugs will be squashed quickly and it goes final by the end of the month.

Posted: Fri Jun 02, 2006 6:48 pm
by dr_asfak
My heartly congratulations on reaching this stage. We are eagerly waiting for final version. But we have yet to resolve some bugs. I would highly suggest to link download page of this RC1 version on frontpage just below 0.2.9 stable version. There are many visitors who don't surf through CIA or forum, but eagerly waiting for 0.3. We could thus find more bugs and extend our support database for non-programmers.

Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2006 2:26 pm
by chriz28
I#m not sure if I#m understanding this correctly, so I'm asking:

Is it already somehow possible to get a copy of 0.3 (without having to compile it myself)??? And where can I download it? If not, does anybody know when it will be available? Can't hardly wait...

Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2006 2:39 pm
by i386DX

Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2006 2:40 pm
by Headstrong
did you try the download page ?

Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2006 2:44 pm
by mcuelenaere
At;O=D are the compiled SVN versions located, but not the ros_0_3_0_branch, and at the download page I can only see v.0.2.9 so I think u have to compile it for yourself.

Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2006 5:13 pm
by chriz28
so I think u have to compile it for yourself.
Sorry, but I'm a complete noob at this stuff. How do I compile it? What do I need to do so?