0.3

Here you can discuss ReactOS related topics.

Moderator: Moderator Team

Cristan
Posts: 170
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:41 am
Location: The Netherlands

0.3

Post by Cristan » Wed Mar 22, 2006 12:54 pm

Now that the auditing is now nicely done in the background, and we now have a nice small, working auditing bar in a less prominent position, let's put the focus back to the REAL important things in life! ;)

Does anybody have any idea how long it's going to take untill 0.3? There are just a lot of very promising things I'd love to try out.

I assume there are still developers working on it, or are most of them busy to get the audit done?

ThePhysicist
Developer
Posts: 508
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 12:46 pm

Post by ThePhysicist » Wed Mar 22, 2006 2:16 pm

The latest svn commits are mostly audit but some other things are dne from tme to time (wine sync, translations, work on cachemanager, imagesoft)
(you can look at the commits at http://cia.navi.cx/stats/project/ReactOS)

Sirmatto
Posts: 113
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 5:55 pm

Re: 0.3

Post by Sirmatto » Wed Mar 22, 2006 9:46 pm

Cristan wrote:Does anybody have any idea how long it's going to take untill 0.3?
A look at the wiki shows that all planned features, except a working IM client, are accomplished, and I remember a dev saying this was negligable. The only blocker bug still open is one dealing with an undetected floppy drive. So with pretty much everything in place, 0.3 should be along very soon.

Ged
Developer
Posts: 925
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 3:00 pm
Location: UK

Post by Ged » Wed Mar 22, 2006 10:36 pm

we need to get the network control panel working.

Jaix
Moderator Team
Posts: 838
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 3:40 pm
Location: Sweden, Växjö

Post by Jaix » Sat Mar 25, 2006 7:33 pm

ged wrote:we need to get the network control panel working.
And the bug in the DHCP for Default Gateway and DNS. http://www.reactos.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1291 It says it affects Realtech but it really affects all network cards that I have tried.

Dr. Fred
Developer
Posts: 607
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 10:09 pm
Location: Amsterdam

Post by Dr. Fred » Sat Mar 25, 2006 10:52 pm

I think we want to audit all asm first.
Where do you want ReactOS to go today ?

Whisper
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2005 8:52 am

Post by Whisper » Sat Apr 01, 2006 6:33 pm

ReactOS .3.0.

I must have it. Daddy needs his medicine.

When... when...?! :cry:

Ged
Developer
Posts: 925
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 3:00 pm
Location: UK

Post by Ged » Sat Apr 01, 2006 6:55 pm

Dr. Fred wrote:I think we want to audit all asm first.
No way, that could take months maybe years.

0.3.0 is almost ready to go. We just need to fix ncpa and do some heavy testing.

GaeTaN
Posts: 81
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 9:08 pm

Post by GaeTaN » Sat Apr 01, 2006 7:31 pm

Ged wrote:
Dr. Fred wrote:I think we want to audit all asm first.
No way, that could take months maybe years.

0.3.0 is almost ready to go. We just need to fix ncpa and do some heavy testing.
Sorry to be weird with that, but will it include FULL usb support for mouse and keyboard (by full I mean all usb keyboard and mouse work), i've already tried the live cd, and this is the only thing that keeps me from testing ros without qemu/vmware (everything was loaded, but i couldn't do anything without keyboard and mouse)

cmoibenlepro
Posts: 483
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 5:44 pm
Location: Canada

Post by cmoibenlepro » Sat Apr 01, 2006 7:41 pm

IIRC I think that usb support is a 0.4 goal.

MadRat
Posts: 243
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 8:29 am
Contact:

Post by MadRat » Sat Apr 01, 2006 9:32 pm

Ged, what does the ncpa.cpl look like in ROS?
*************************************
Go Huskers!

Ged
Developer
Posts: 925
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 3:00 pm
Location: UK

Post by Ged » Sun Apr 02, 2006 4:27 pm

MadRat wrote:Ged, what does the ncpa.cpl look like in ROS?
Exactly like the Windows one.

MadRat
Posts: 243
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 8:29 am
Contact:

Post by MadRat » Sun Apr 02, 2006 11:36 pm

Well, ncpa.cpl is different for each version of Windows, so your answer is really being general. Was hoping for more detail, like NT 4.0 look versus the XP look. :)
*************************************
Go Huskers!

dr_asfak
Posts: 25
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 7:53 pm

0.2.10

Post by dr_asfak » Sun Apr 30, 2006 11:14 am

Now much development has done after 0.2.9 and but still we are somewhat behind 0.3 goals, we should better go for intermediate version of 0.2.10. The reason are :

1) Eveyone has higher expectations from 0.3, but as discussed earlier there are many task to be completed. Our developer are trying hard for this and we wish them all the best.

2) Non-programmer like me would like to test as many applications on latest stable version. Current SVN builds are very unstable (i have tried few).

3) Maybe students at Google Summer of Code would always prefer newer version

Ged
Developer
Posts: 925
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 3:00 pm
Location: UK

Re: 0.2.10

Post by Ged » Sun Apr 30, 2006 1:26 pm

dr_asfak wrote:Now much development has done after 0.2.9 and but still we are somewhat behind 0.3 goals, we should better go for intermediate version of 0.2.10
We are very close to 0.3.0, there is only 1 remaining job which is the ncpa, then we need some heavy bug testing.
We won't be doing another 0.2.* release.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest