File Copy time estimates

Here you can discuss ReactOS related topics.

Moderator: Moderator Team

Post Reply
Posts: 1028
Joined: Tue May 07, 2013 9:18 pm
Location: California, USA

File Copy time estimates

Post by middings »

In the topic [url=]ReactOS kernel status[/url], PurpleGurl wrote:Yes, the percentages would be no more accurate than Windows's estimated file transfer times. 1 minute, 3 days, 2 hours, 30 seconds, done.
xkcd Estimation

Will ReactOS be bug-for-bug compatible with Windows's estimated file transfer times? Knowing if there is time to get a cup of coffee depends on this. :lol:

Why does the copy dialog give such horrible estimates? Raymond Chen of Microsoft answers.
(Bonus blog comments by MS's Larry Osterman.)

Choosing the information a file copy dialog shows to the user is surprisingly difficult. Raymond Chen again,
Why doesn’t the Windows Vista copy progress dialog show the names of the files being copied?
and Why doesn’t the Windows Vista copy progress dialog show the names of the files being copied?, redux

Posts: 1788
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2009 5:11 am
Location: USA

Re: File Copy time estimates

Post by PurpleGurl »

I imagine we could do better without hurting things, since I don't think this is an essential bug. For reference, Windows 7 has the WEI index to give a rough idea of how well the PC performs. Now, what if there was a way to store estimates and average PC performance in advance and take that into account, maybe adjust it with time? Now, the problem is that there are too many variables. The amount of available memory would determine the size of buffers used, CPU performance and current load would affect copying speed, and hard drive usage would also need to be taken into account. The problem is that these cannot be predicted, and if you measure them each time, you make things more complicated than necessary and may slow things more.

User avatar
Posts: 1584
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2008 9:44 pm
Location: Czechia

Re: File Copy time estimates

Post by Black_Fox »

As the network bandwidth increases and many consumers (who don't want to understand the complexity of giving a good prediction) are switching from HDDs to SSDs, I think this problem is not as bad as it was earlier.
BTW, thanks for linking The Old New Thing, luckily I've read only about three or four of the blogposts, I still have some part of the evening left :D

Posts: 1050
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2004 1:36 pm
Location: Italy

Re: File Copy time estimates

Post by forart »

I strongly suggest to "learn" copy-mechanism from FastCopy:
»Forward Agency NPO
In progress we (always) trust.

User avatar
Posts: 114
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 11:21 am
Location: Spain ← Europe ← Planet Earth ← Milky Way ← Universe

Re: File Copy time estimates

Post by Swyter »

Just by using a rolling window average to smooth out bytes/sec the estimation would look a bit more realistic.
There are fancier things like Kalman filters that can provide even better results. Shouldn't be that difficult.

[ external image ]

See how the raw spikes get averaged.
External patch contributor for ux/user-mode/l10n/winapi. Sometimes I fix a bit of everything everywhere.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Baidu [Spider], r3mendozal and 4 guests