0.4.0

Here you can discuss ReactOS related topics.

Moderator: Moderator Team

eersoy93
Posts: 289
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2012 11:24 pm
Contact:

0.4.0

Post by eersoy93 »

Hi!

Which is 0.4.0 based the NT version's architecture?

Thanks for answers.

User avatar
EmuandCo
Developer
Posts: 4425
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 7:52 pm
Location: Germany, Bavaria, Steinfeld
Contact:

Re: 0.4.0

Post by EmuandCo »

NT 5.2, as 0.3.15, too.
ReactOS is still in alpha stage, meaning it is not feature-complete and is recommended only for evaluation and testing purposes.

eersoy93
Posts: 289
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2012 11:24 pm
Contact:

Re: 0.4.0

Post by eersoy93 »

EmuandCo wrote:NT 5.2, as 0.3.15, too.
What will be the build number of this? 3959 or 3790?

See also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Se ... ice_Pack_2

Z98
Release Engineer
Posts: 3379
Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 8:16 pm
Contact:

Re: 0.4.0

Post by Z98 »

That build number has no relevance to our roadmap/plans.

eersoy93
Posts: 289
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2012 11:24 pm
Contact:

Re: 0.4.0

Post by eersoy93 »

Which will the icon set of 0.4.0?

gonzoMD
Posts: 1048
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 7:49 am
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re: 0.4.0

Post by gonzoMD »

eersoy93 wrote:Which will the icon set of 0.4.0?
there are no plans for optical design issues (at least maybe lautus but not more) because we have something that works more or less. More manpower is needed to get the system more feature complete and stable (LDR/MM Regressions, Hardware issues, etc).
I think if somebody would offer a complete(!!!!) icon set it could maybe used.
in the past were AFAIK some people, that offered a few icons, but not all so the designs were good but incomplete so they weren't very usefull.

Linuxgamer94
Posts: 77
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2013 1:16 pm

Re: 0.4.0

Post by Linuxgamer94 »

It needs to work first before it can even reach .4. Even the solitare game is unfineshed. It crashes on me alot and the AI makes the game unplayable. I would think they would try to port over MDM, why reinvent the login screen if it has been done. Why not try to port some of compiz too, I would love to see React OS with the Desktop cube and 3D windows. Oh I also think that React OS can learn a lot from Cinnamon just saying.

Z98
Release Engineer
Posts: 3379
Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 8:16 pm
Contact:

Re: 0.4.0

Post by Z98 »

We're not Unix. What makes you think things that were designed from the ground up to run on a Unix platform would work on ReactOS?

fred02
Posts: 551
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 5:54 pm

Re: 0.4.0

Post by fred02 »

Linuxgamer94 wrote:I would think they would try to port over MDM, why reinvent the login screen if it has been done.
Because the security infrastructure and API are not finished yet?
Linuxgamer94 wrote:Why not try to port some of compiz too, I would love to see React OS with the Desktop cube and 3D windows.
Shells are inherently replaceable, like in Windows, so pick your choice, but the underlying OS have to stable first.

User avatar
Pesho
Posts: 209
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 1:16 pm

Re: 0.4.0

Post by Pesho »

Don't you hate it when people start making stupid suggestions about implementing linux stuff just because "it's already finished and is thus easier to port"... Why doesn't Linux support the Windows driver architecture and shell yet, i mean, it's already finished - why cant they just port it over! Either that, or it's gimmicky toy features like 3D windows.

Dave3434
Posts: 323
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:14 am

Re: 0.4.0

Post by Dave3434 »

by Pesho » 29 Apr 2013 07:40
Don't you hate it when people start making stupid suggestions about implementing linux stuff just because "it's already finished and is thus easier to port"... Why doesn't Linux support the Windows driver architecture and shell yet, i mean, it's already finished - why cant they just port it over! Either that, or it's gimmicky toy features like 3D windows.
i agree btw any chance of moving to the U.S?? i'm sure you'll get more exposer that way.

fred02
Posts: 551
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 5:54 pm

Re: 0.4.0

Post by fred02 »

Pesho wrote:Don't you hate it when people start making stupid suggestions about implementing linux stuff just because "it's already finished and is thus easier to port"...
Yep. We could use a better FAQ for ROS(Frequent Annoying Questions :) ) and more importantly have it better exposed on the forum.
Yes, I know, there is a sticky "software usable for ROS" thread with a pretty clear explanation of what can and cannot be included, and this does not preclude people from regularly suggesting Qt, Delphi, VB and other funny stuff.
(and here we go off-topic again :oops: )

Linuxgamer94
Posts: 77
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2013 1:16 pm

Re: 0.4.0

Post by Linuxgamer94 »

This message was deleted by a moderator for violation of code of conduct #1. First warning.

Dave3434
Posts: 323
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:14 am

Re: 0.4.0

Post by Dave3434 »

who me?
by Linuxgamer94 » 23 Jun 2013 00:11
This message was deleted by a moderator for violation of code of conduct #1. First warning.

User avatar
jonaspm
Posts: 585
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2011 1:10 am
Location: Mexico
Contact:

Re: 0.4.0

Post by jonaspm »

Pesho wrote:Don't you hate it when people start making stupid suggestions about implementing linux stuff just because "it's already finished and is thus easier to port"... Why doesn't Linux support the Windows driver architecture and shell yet, i mean, it's already finished - why cant they just port it over! Either that, or it's gimmicky toy features like 3D windows.

Don't be that rude man :) he is a bit new so anyone is free to suggest ideas :D

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 4 guests