Page 4 of 5
Re: [Official]Testing request to the ReactOS Community
Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 8:36 pm
by vicmarcal
oswetto wrote:fulup, THANK YOU!
Samba-tng work!!!
ALL GOLDENAPPS are tested!!!
\0/
Thanks guys!
Btw, the regression found has been set as a blocker of 0.3.15
Re: [Official]Testing request to the ReactOS Community
Posted: Sat Mar 30, 2013 4:12 pm
by zehnvor
you should test Notepad lite again, after CORE-7027 seems to be fixed
- even if it is not the target revision
Re: [Official]Testing request to the ReactOS Community
Posted: Sat Mar 30, 2013 5:05 pm
by oswetto
r58614: Gs Notepade lite work very well.
Re: [Official]Testing request to the ReactOS Community
Posted: Sun Mar 31, 2013 3:17 pm
by vicmarcal
Thanks guys!
The testing have shown that we didn't lose compatibility with the Golden Apps
Just a slightly regression which at first sight was introduced by a memory manager but that ended being a real bug in other past of the code which was revealed thanks to the memory manager commit.
ThFabba did a great job finding the reason and fixing it.
So next step:
Waiting for the RC based on the revision choosen with the patches that fixes the regressions.
That shouldn't take too long
Re: [Official]Testing request to the ReactOS Community
Posted: Sun Mar 31, 2013 3:38 pm
by fred02
vicmarcal wrote:So next step:
Waiting for the RC based on the revision choosen with the patches that fixes the regressions.
That shouldn't take too long
Now that's a
NEWS 
Re: [Official]Testing request to the ReactOS Community
Posted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 7:59 pm
by CSRedRat
0.4.1 released!
http://www.reactos.org/wiki/ChangeLog-0.3.15
And has been start testing 0.4.1! ReactOS beta!!!
P.S. I'm have UTC+6 (23:59 01.04
)
Re: [Official]Testing request to the ReactOS Community
Posted: Tue Apr 02, 2013 6:25 am
by PascalDragon
You do know that the 0.4 series is still considered Alpha? At least if nothing changed since I last looked at the roadmap...
Regards,
Sven
Re: [Official]Testing request to the ReactOS Community
Posted: Tue Apr 02, 2013 10:15 am
by CSRedRat
On my request re-checking the ReactOS project - a large report by PVS-Studio (Static Code Analyzer):
http://www.viva64.com/en/b/0192/
First check:
http://www.viva64.com/en/a/0076/
Re: [Official]Testing request to the ReactOS Community
Posted: Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:10 pm
by vicmarcal
Thanks, some patches are being done based on the results.
Re: [Official]Testing request to the ReactOS Community
Posted: Tue Apr 02, 2013 2:00 pm
by wildschwein
Did you accept the offer to use PVS for free, for a certain while ?
I read the article about PVS and ROS and i was really astonished !
Re: [Official]Testing request to the ReactOS Community
Posted: Tue Apr 02, 2013 3:49 pm
by Z98
They made no such offer.
Re: [Official]Testing request to the ReactOS Community
Posted: Tue Apr 02, 2013 3:51 pm
by Black_Fox
Actually, they did
http://reactos.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=12441 --- this is a verbatim copy of
http://www.viva64.com/en/b/0192/ so it is valid and legit
Andrey_Karpov wrote:The PVS-Studio demo version will be insufficient to examine all the 4887 warnings. However, we are friendly to open-source projects: if the ReactOS developers ask us, we'll give them our tool for free for a while.
Re: [Official]Testing request to the ReactOS Community
Posted: Tue Apr 02, 2013 3:55 pm
by Z98
Note the "for a while" part. There was some contact in the past, but the price they proposed was at levels of corporate licensing.
Re: [Official]Testing request to the ReactOS Community
Posted: Tue Apr 02, 2013 4:24 pm
by Black_Fox
I know, wildschwein also mentions it. Well, is the time-limited offer suitable to at least for devs generating and saving all the 4500 warnings somewhere for fixing them later when the offer times out?
Re: [Official]Testing request to the ReactOS Community
Posted: Thu Apr 04, 2013 7:49 pm
by wildschwein
Read the article, and see what really "funny" bugs PVS found. Yeah, devs are also humans, this should not be any criticism - BEWARE !
you know that i bow me deep to EVERY dev, because you are all so great and do "THE PROJECT" of the 21.century...
Code: Select all
....
for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
/* The signs must match. */
if (src->channel[i].type != src->channel[i].type) {
return FALSE;
....
}
Why not "borrow" Full Version of PVS for a while, analyse ROS code, save results, give it back - and work with the error-list from PVS.
PVS would like to help ROS - in my opinion