Yes, is a "good" stash.

This might be result obvious heaviness for the experienced user.

Anyway the forum is not the place for bug reports, but http://jira.reactos.org/secure/Dashboard.jspa

"What's about a handkerchief as mascot?", "what's about an owl as mascot?", "what's about a keyborad as mascot?", etc... or a mach for RectOS mascot? and call it reMatch?, "do our wanna a snail as mascot? yes fine, let's put in every ReactOS page a photograf of a s...

But this is not reflected in the main page as don't appears any "Enter Chat"/"Enter IRC" tab alongside "Forum", "Wiki", etc... or elsewhere.

Your design?.

Seen what Amine says here http://www.reactos.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=12927#p104968, we shouldn't be discouraged by any single reaction of a dev/ROS official. Wich implies we neighter shouldn't be encouraged by any single reaction of a dev/ROS official. Null. My unpleasant feeling sometime...

That's sounds the same as ever... ¿How can Google get profits from a nonprofit project?.

Well yes probably when Windows Server 2003 support ends 14 july 2015 (if not surprises) the follow target maybe will be Windows Server 2008 support ends 14 January 2020 (if not surprises).

If i remember correctly (readed somewhere) you are right, ReactOS is not functional whit that file system.

Free software doesn't have to be free of charge :roll: It is preferable to be free of charge (and open source) if you expected what people devel and/or test and report debug logs for free. A thin client version of - say $10.00 - could finance the rest of the ReactOS development. That's the way, but...

Yeah, but the problem i see whit that, is what ReactOS development targets/priorities cannot (by principles) be oriented for "i made this improvement specially for call attention of corporations to get $". Or what some in-housee group creates another ReactOS branch for this purpose, exampl...

Well i still think what at this point just a new explorer to 0.4... plus this one would impressive:

http://jira.reactos.org/browse/CORE-7481

Sorry, but i don't see what those improvements justifies "0.4", but yes "0.3.16".

Well it maybe is considered outdated and not fully working by now but something exists: http://www.reactos.org/wiki/ARM_Port Besides, many mobile providers (Verizon, etc) don't like an open platform. They want things locked down, and ROS is very open. ¿?, but if Android and Firefox OS are open sourc...

But all this not explain why even any mobile manufacturer don't are interesed in ReactOS, but i'm not talking about smartphones i'm talking about the cheapest mobiles wich don't need the last Android or even FirefoxOS.