Search found 384 matches

by ctasan
Tue Jan 30, 2018 9:34 pm
Forum: General Discussion and Feedback
Topic: A question about Community Changelogs
Replies: 13
Views: 5609

Re: A question about Community Changelogs

My question is about marketing. We have no issues about Community Changelog. :) Nevertheless, we can improve it. Especially, Phoronix heavily uses it. We can highlight important improvements and divert the attention to right place. However, this is a joint work, so we should decide together, what's ...
by ctasan
Tue Jan 30, 2018 2:33 pm
Forum: General Discussion and Feedback
Topic: A question about Community Changelogs
Replies: 13
Views: 5609

Re: A question about Community Changelogs

Good point, nevertheless, the first post is the most important one.
Posts for voting can be written with a distinct style. (e.g color, bold/italic/underline...) We don't have another option; it's not a poll or test, it's an open-ended question.
by ctasan
Tue Jan 30, 2018 1:42 pm
Forum: General Discussion and Feedback
Topic: A question about Community Changelogs
Replies: 13
Views: 5609

Re: A question about Community Changelogs

gonzoMD wrote:I'd like that. which changes will be highlighted could either be a decision of the release engineer or voted for at the meeting.
I think this decision should be made by Community, with a wide spectrum of comments. Release engineer already defines the highlights in the official release.
by ctasan
Tue Jan 30, 2018 11:31 am
Forum: General Discussion and Feedback
Topic: A question about Community Changelogs
Replies: 13
Views: 5609

A question about Community Changelogs

I posted this under the 0.4.7 changelog, but it went unnoticed. So, I'm asking again:

Should we highlight some improvements in the changelog? This should be highly useful for readers or sites like Phoronix.

If you agree, please write improvements that most important for you, under 0.4.7 changelog.
by ctasan
Sat Jan 27, 2018 8:45 am
Forum: General Discussion and Feedback
Topic: Community Changelog: 0.4.8 (Work-in-progress)
Replies: 47
Views: 26038

Re: Community Changelog: 0.4.8 (Work-in-progress)

I have an idea.
Should we highlight some important changes for web sites (especially Phoronix) that use our changelog?
If you agree, please share most important ones.
by ctasan
Sun Jan 21, 2018 11:34 am
Forum: General Discussion and Feedback
Topic: One-Core API is a fraud
Replies: 13
Views: 6448

Re: One-Core API is a fraud

I overlooked the tree again. (Especially headers) One-Core API does not seem to include dirty code , so it's no problem. Using ReactOS and Wine code. However, author has a fork of WRK. We're thinking wrong. One-Core API is not a problem of its own, and the fork of WRK is in another branch. Resoluti...
by ctasan
Thu Jan 18, 2018 10:20 pm
Forum: Support
Topic: WOW16 Support
Replies: 7
Views: 6007

Re: WOW16 Support

Support for 16-bit Windows 3.11 apps is not implemented yet. Based on your post "9x era" it could be a setup problem. Many 32-bit programs used 16-bit setups in that time. You can look here: http://reactos.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=10988 i have disks of office 95,97 and 2000 95's install seems...
by ctasan
Thu Jan 18, 2018 10:18 pm
Forum: General Discussion and Feedback
Topic: One-Core API is a fraud
Replies: 13
Views: 6448

Re: One-Core API is a fraud

I overlooked the tree again. (Especially headers) One-Core API does not seem to include dirty code , so it's no problem. Using ReactOS and Wine code. However, author has a fork of WRK. We're thinking wrong. One-Core API is not a problem of its own, and the fork of WRK is in another branch. Resolutio...
by ctasan
Wed Jan 17, 2018 11:20 pm
Forum: General Discussion and Feedback
Topic: Community Changelog: 0.4.8 (Work-in-progress)
Replies: 47
Views: 26038

Re: Community Changelog: 0.4.8 (Work-in-progress)

learn_more wrote:
kernel32: Accept newer programs.

That change was from colin, not me.
Fixed it!
by ctasan
Wed Jan 17, 2018 11:15 pm
Forum: Support
Topic: WOW16 Support
Replies: 7
Views: 6007

Re: WOW16 Support

Support for 16-bit Windows 3.11 apps is not implemented yet.
Based on your post "9x era" it could be a setup problem. Many 32-bit programs used 16-bit setups in that time. You can look here: http://reactos.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=10988
by ctasan
Mon Jan 15, 2018 7:59 am
Forum: General Discussion and Feedback
Topic: Community Changelog: 0.4.8 (Work-in-progress)
Replies: 47
Views: 26038

Re: Community Changelog: 0.4.8 (Work-in-progress)

Write support is unusable at the moment, it requires more work. However, read support should be in a good shape. Yes. There is a registry key to add to force writes, but that should only be used for testing as it is not complete. As said on final GSoC report, many write features are incomplete, so ...
by ctasan
Sun Jan 14, 2018 10:09 pm
Forum: General Discussion and Feedback
Topic: EPIC WIN!
Replies: 1254
Views: 1119544

Re: EPIC WIN!

This is an epic of the epic win!!! The beginnings of NT6+ support!
Hope also our core development speeds up!
by ctasan
Sun Jan 14, 2018 9:58 pm
Forum: General Discussion and Feedback
Topic: Community Changelog: 0.4.8 (Work-in-progress)
Replies: 47
Views: 26038

Re: Community Changelog: 0.4.8 (Work-in-progress)

binarymaster wrote:
petr-akhlamov wrote:*Win2000-like bootscreen (dd71fb5)
*Dr.Watson basic implementation (280d7a9)
Looks like this post was ignored and not added to changelog... :?
Sorry, you're right. I haven't seen new rotation bar for a while. A nice touch!
Added it along with a few additions.
by ctasan
Sat Jan 13, 2018 7:23 pm
Forum: General Discussion and Feedback
Topic: Community Changelog: 0.4.8 (Work-in-progress)
Replies: 47
Views: 26038

Re: Community Changelog: 0.4.8 (Work-in-progress)

petr-akhlamov wrote:*Forced launch of NT6 applications was implemented (PR-273, 63a3a2c)
Updated now, thanks!