Ak chces skusat na skutocnom hardware-y zozen si nejaky starsi crepik, nejaku PIII 500 Mhz, hlavne nech to ma PATA (IDE) a PS2 mys a klavu (cez redukciu pripojis aj USB zariadenia), RAM-ky to tiez nemusi mat vela, myslim, ze 32-64 MB je dost. Cez COM port si potom mozes napojit debug konzolu. To mas...

... plus does some heuristic analysis and tries to guess maliciousness, and uses other advanced techniques which require higher knowledge to grasp, than simple file checking :) ... EDIT: For thomasgilling go on start doing it, if you really want it. Devs are solving the things they like and decide w...

cute gf

oiaohm - you said some safeguards are left from Win XP DirectX, can you elaborate more on this? Where can I find some info? Will be those safeguards left out from ReactOS too? zydon - if you are nitpicking just go and install FreeDOS, your machine will boot up in like 3 seconds. With UDMA driver wi...

NTFS urcite v ROSe bude, nakolko to je ciel projektu uplna binarna kompatabilita. Sucasny driver je zrejme tazka alfa :). Pokial viem vacsina veci okolo IFS stoji pretoze treba prepisat Cache Manager. Ak som to spravne pochopil je to dost vitalne, ale nikto sa tomu momentalne nevenuje, zrejme chyba ...

Z98 thanks too for amazing eyeopener by fitting things into perspective !!!

Would it be possible to make window manager part of Win32K compositing?

Windows everywhere from early X's Motif based design can get appreciated when you have multiple monitors. However, clutter on the taskbar can get quite bad easily, so far best UI I've experienced on dual/tri-monitor setup was GTKradiant's one. You can shape it any way u like, detach and place some p...

That's wrong. ReactOS registry hives are binary hives *almost* compatible with windows I don't know if they contain acls My mistake, I believe then, what I said, was true some very long time ago. The problem is however till the ACLs are done, basic OS security at group/user level cannot be even tes...

When some advanced devs and windows coders look back on COM, what do they think, was this technology useful or not? From my personal perspective I see it only usefulness of this from OLE perspective (if I got it right and OLE means EXCEL within WORD document). But if I would be writing shell myself ...

I am delighted to hear that . I consider myself procedural programming to be superior in every area besides GUI shite.

What about 4DOS NT equivalent 4NT (I guess)? It had some useful feats.

Those forums are of no use seems like it, plus it somehows always seemed a bit fishy that only devs provide binaries. No updates on source forge and why does doewnload manager need dbghelp.dll? What's that file?

Slowness, turn up console, turn up sysinternals - process explorer and watch the CPU go high. Inability to use some fancier VESA 2 text modes or gfx console. Volkov Commander is really sweet on high resolutions in DOS true is that COMMAND.COM, is not so friendly without ANSI.SYS. Maybe all that can ...

Is writing them in C bad idea? What approach WINE uses?