Then emulate the hardware access. That's what DOSEMU does, and I believe NTVDM as well.
Moll.
Search found 5 matches
- Tue Mar 15, 2005 9:06 pm
- Forum: General Discussion and Feedback
- Topic: sandbox for Win16 and DOS applications
- Replies: 19
- Views: 14310
- Wed Mar 02, 2005 7:01 pm
- Forum: General Discussion and Feedback
- Topic: Want to work on subsystem
- Replies: 60
- Views: 46250
- Sat Feb 26, 2005 5:50 pm
- Forum: General Discussion and Feedback
- Topic: New Subsystem Ideas
- Replies: 92
- Views: 60478
CP/M-86 could theoretically sit on top of a DOS subsystem, they have basically the same filename limitations, they don't use the same interrupts, or file extensions, I've run a CP/M-86 emulator quite well on top of DOS. One thing I've been trying to do is reproduce the CP/M functionality and try to ...
- Sat Jan 29, 2005 7:17 am
- Forum: General Discussion and Feedback
- Topic: Win98SE looks like ReactOS
- Replies: 5
- Views: 7852
- Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:49 pm
- Forum: General Discussion and Feedback
- Topic: New Subsystem Ideas
- Replies: 92
- Views: 60478
OTOH
Personally, I believe a DOS subsystem would be quite important, since I run lots of DOS apps on Windows 2000 and did also on 98SE.
Perhaps it would be better to work from FreeDOS and DOSEMU, which virtualizes, rather than DOSBOX, which emulates.
Moll.
Perhaps it would be better to work from FreeDOS and DOSEMU, which virtualizes, rather than DOSBOX, which emulates.
Moll.