Comparing to - FreeDOS ("just" FUCKUNG DOS!) - BlueLion ex eComStation ex OS/2 - OpenVMS on x86, ReactOS is not advancing unusually slow. Bear in mind, Windows is primarily a "consumer OS" ... Which translates to A LOT of "bells & whistles" which "big iron" OSes do not have. Have you actually tried ...

I LOVE this. "Oh, it's been a decade, but hey, let's just pick up where we left!"

Personal opinion: Offer a configuration with "Linux as firmware", if possible. I.e. when people install it, it installs into a VM straightaway. There is nothing "shameful" in that, and it will INSTANTLY make ROS "more widespread", IFF that is even desired.

Because 17 years ago the version was... new. And they have a handful of developers and not a myriad. The answer is trivial, when you think of it. It is the same reason why a bunch of enthusiasts can come together and make a yacht — but not an ocean liner. And it is perhaps better to get a nice yacht...

And to those of you who talk of retro-computing, sorry pals, people are using 98 or XP. Because the "freedom" of an open-source OS matters only in so far as you have open-source apps. And if your apps are closed source (like MS Office or games), then the "openness" of the OS no longer matters. (And ...

Face it: it _IS_ pointless. That is, compared to Linux' importance and perhaps even all the scale down to NetBSD. Then again, what is the point of skydiving, racing, soccer or tennis? Men and women mistreating balls is half our sports world, UTTERLY pointless! It is an OS. And in reality, the "most ...

That's the whole point. NOT all core components are THEIRS to "open source", and they cannot cleanly separate them without having to re-develop parts. I just gave an example, but the issue is general. It has to do with the problem that licenses can be given for specific usage manners... but not for ...

Well, AFAIR, they indeed considered doing this. Windows per se makes rather little money, and "binding the customer" for their other products appeared even more advantageous. - The problem, and why their legal department killed the idea: Windows contains a lot of third-party-code which has been lice...

Your real issue is that "Windows is not Windows". It is a permanently moving target. You have two options: - create a sort of "legacy OS" like FreeDOS (and optionally: develop from there to new heights, the way C64 still gets improvements...); or - "run after the main target", but here, you clearly ...

I say, "drop it". It is 2018. Unless this shall become "Retro OS" (then by all means, go for it!)...

And EXACTLY WHAT will you do with an ARM port? - ReactOS is only an OS, not a "suite of apps"! So will you then handle compiling everything on ARM by yourself, from Firefox to LibreOffice? It "sounds nice", but is entirely pointless in a greater perspective right now.

Ah, and dizt3mp3r: Your message to them on their Github-page was ... brilliant. I mean, I really could learn something from you there - in particular the rhetoric twist in the beginning, "It is an answer to the concern but it does not resolve it", was amazing - you stood your ground firmly, yet very...

Oh, I am sure we all have our thoughts regarding this issue. But they are not important now: the matter has been reviewed and handled. If that is the outcome - that is the outcome. If anyone is dissatisfied with this, he may draw his own conclusions and decisions from here on. And yes, in our projec...

The problems are going in several directions: 1. if you do not defend a brand, you may forfeit your right to defend it later on; 2. the longer you wait, the easier you get a time bar problem; 3. thank you for telling me that Aleksey is fireball. I PM-ed him, too; 4. German attorneys have sometimes a...

Absolutely. Do contact Aleksey. I just didn't know his username to PM him together with others about this. In the past, he has shown great effort to defend the interest of the project and to spread its fame, so I am sure he will co-ordinate action suitably, whether it means to initiate legal steps, ...