Search found 18 matches
- Fri Jul 28, 2023 8:39 pm
- Forum: Off Topic
- Topic: "Flex drivers development: Are there any ongoing efforts to develop Flex-specific drivers for ReactOS
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2720
Re: "Flex drivers development: Are there any ongoing efforts to develop Flex-specific drivers for ReactOS
However, I have noticed that there is a lack of support for Flex drivers, which can be a problem for those who rely on Flex devices . If the devices have Windows Server 2003 support, the expected way is to try installing the original drivers, like these: https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/ibm-server...
- Sat Jul 22, 2023 6:35 pm
- Forum: Off Topic
- Topic: Software RAID 5 in Windows 7
- Replies: 6
- Views: 12123
Re: Software RAID 5 in Windows 7
Software RAID 5 appears to be available in Microsoft Windows Server 2003 according to this Microsoft support article, How To Establish a Striped Volume with Parity (RAID-5) in Windows Server 2003 . Seems like the original content was deleted. It's still possible to get it: https://web.archive.org/w...
- Sat Jul 22, 2023 5:52 pm
- Forum: General Discussion and Feedback
- Topic: GSOC
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2661
Re: GSOC
Most probably you would get details on the MatterMost chat: https://chat.reactos.org/login Excerpt from February 18, 2023: Hi devs. Does anybody know: will be ReactOS project accepted in GSoC this year? If so, isn't the acceptance of participants finished yet? I hope to finish my C/C++ courses until...
- Sun Oct 03, 2021 1:26 pm
- Forum: General Discussion and Feedback
- Topic: GitLab mirror
- Replies: 25
- Views: 19877
Re: GitLab mirror
Just now I asked contacts of that GitLab account using the abuse reporting : The ReactOS project needs a contact with the https://gitlab.com/reactos user. One hosts the ReactOS repo https://gitlab.com/reactos/reactos under the official organization name: https://gitlab.com/reactos/reactos/-/issues/1...
- Sun Oct 03, 2021 12:55 pm
- Forum: News
- Topic: ReactOS 0.4.13 released
- Replies: 19
- Views: 39456
Re: ReactOS 0.4.13 released
Is there any measurement (quantitative or qualitative, calculated or empirical) available in public to get a more detailed overall picture?
Thanks from a fly-by guy. :)
- Sat Sep 28, 2019 4:30 pm
- Forum: Support
- Topic: Make .iso images bootable from MBR (or GPT) partitions
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2050
Re: Make .iso images bootable from MBR (or GPT) partitions
I mean scenario like this: Download SGD [2] , Kaspersky [1] or Rescatux [3]. All three are hybrid GRUB iso9660 images. Dump one of them into /dev/loop1p1 # cat [...].iso > /dev/loop1p1 Run under kvm or qemu. It will hang on "GRUB": # qemu -hda /dev/loop1 Now download almost whatever live d...
- Sat Sep 28, 2019 4:24 pm
- Forum: Support
- Topic: Make .iso images bootable from MBR (or GPT) partitions
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2050
Make .iso images bootable from MBR (or GPT) partitions
Hello there, once I saw the challenge (or feature bounty) called: Make our ISOs flashable to USB drives ("isohybrid") I suppose this works now: CORE-12648 , CORE-13184 I guess one can overwrite hard disk with the .iso , and then it boots. Fine. My idea is to take the implementation a step ...
- Mon Apr 22, 2019 11:28 am
- Forum: General Discussion and Feedback
- Topic: Chromebook
- Replies: 10
- Views: 2766
Re: Chromebook
@Reactions, I was referring to my own collection:)
PS. OK, my bad: Toshiba CB30 is x86 based.
PS. OK, my bad: Toshiba CB30 is x86 based.
- Sun Apr 14, 2019 2:04 pm
- Forum: General Discussion and Feedback
- Topic: REACTOS-Medienforschung, München: is it related ?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 657
REACTOS-Medienforschung, München: is it related ?
I found these references by googling about ReactOS:
http://www.lit-verlag.de/isbn/3-643-11976-6
https://www.booklooker.de/Bücher/Angebo ... nforschung
Does anyone know, is this publishing organization related to the OS development?
http://www.lit-verlag.de/isbn/3-643-11976-6
https://www.booklooker.de/Bücher/Angebo ... nforschung
Does anyone know, is this publishing organization related to the OS development?
- Sun Apr 14, 2019 12:56 pm
- Forum: General Discussion and Feedback
- Topic: Chromebook
- Replies: 10
- Views: 2766
Re: Chromebook
Don't Chromebooks have ARM processors? ReactOS doesn't yet have ARM support, so unless I'm mistaken about Chromebook, it will certainly BSOD. No, if ReactOS has no ARM support, it shouldn't make a BSOD since the bootloader wouldn't work. And no, ReactOS has ARM support (only if lacking developers),...
- Wed Aug 24, 2016 8:56 pm
- Forum: General Discussion and Feedback
- Topic: Blog: Google SoC lwIP Report Week 10
- Replies: 34
- Views: 33092
Re: Blog: Google SoC lwIP Report Week 10
Regarding mTCP being a user library... [...] and I'm sure you've learned a few things from all the other posts people have made here. Definitelly yes. My main omission, I guess, was the surrounding layers of networking stack -- these below TCP/IP (NDIS) and ones above (AFD, TDI). Then differences i...
- Fri Aug 19, 2016 3:31 pm
- Forum: General Discussion and Feedback
- Topic: Blog: Google SoC lwIP Report Week 10
- Replies: 34
- Views: 33092
Re: Blog: Google SoC lwIP Report Week 10
I didn't literally mean "everyone," just the ROS devs who worked with it. My point is that it would likely be easier to write the stack and drivers from scratch. I'm not a references or sources person. PurpleGurl , I didn't either. My idea was to find out responses from previous tries. Kn...
- Wed Aug 17, 2016 2:25 pm
- Forum: General Discussion and Feedback
- Topic: Blog: Google SoC lwIP Report Week 10
- Replies: 34
- Views: 33092
Re: Blog: Google SoC lwIP Report Week 10
Some weeks ago, being inspired by the experiments and blog entries of zhu48 , I decided to search for alternatives of lwIP to see how do they deal with the same task. I found several stacks -- mostly targeted at embedded systems and being only partial or very minimalistic, though. One of them caught...
- Wed Aug 17, 2016 2:21 pm
- Forum: General Discussion and Feedback
- Topic: Blog: Google SoC lwIP Report Week 10
- Replies: 34
- Views: 33092
Re: Blog: Google SoC lwIP Report Week 10
I mean, everyone keeps writing wrappers for LWIP and everything gets bugged Can you give references so I could count these people? because it seems we are using LWIP in ways it was not intended to be used. It wasn't intended for multi-threaded applications. If all the time that was spent on getting...
- Mon Jul 04, 2016 2:47 pm
- Forum: General Discussion and Feedback
- Topic: Blog: Google SoC lwIP Report Week 6
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3193
Re: Blog: Google SoC lwIP Report Week 6
Nice one.