i think that using mount points instead of drive letters will scare off a ton of new users.. i mean really .. the reason most people use windows is because its easy, and lets face it .. mount points are confusing as hell for people that have never used a *nix os. i agree that it would be cool ... bu...

i agree whole heartedly the api's are what should be focused on .. think of it this way .. your car wont work without a power source.. your media player wont work without the support apis .. stop bickering about what player is better and blah blah blah ... the important thing is the underlying stuff

:shock: i cant belive your forgetting xfs ... sgi's baby .. the file system to end all file systems http://www.sgi.com/products/software/xfs/ open source too Max. File Size Designed to scale to 9 million TB with current hardware supporting scalability to 8000 TB on IRIX. Linux-64, 2 TB Max File Size...

im very interested in sound support as well, being a dj sound is very important to me

just thinking we could use bittorrent to distribute nightly builds would solve the problem of finding hosting.

the absolute last thing we need is another scripting language imo the ones that are availible are fine, also it would just be something to distract the developers from doing whats important.... WRITING THE OS!

Anyway, i think OpenBeFS would be better for ReactOS: i must dissagree here if you want a 64 bit journaling file system, the best out there is xfs by sgi, they have been doing 64 bit journaled file systems since most script kiddies were in diapers. i think that if you compare the specs of Sgi XFS a...

Third-party open source media players are not a bad suggestion, but I personally think an in-house Media Player is a much more pleasant and seamless solution.

i agree completely here... perhaps it could be wmc striped down to just include the features that were in wmp v6.4.

ive got a dual p2 333 with 256mb of ram that i can test on

ok common people go vote!! you know it would be cool to be able to run os/2 apps in ros..

well keep at it .. we apreciate your work and all of the devs work on ros.!!!

everyone that wants an os2 subsystem go vote for reactos at this site!!! http://www.osfree.org/

omg yes! i completely forgot about cp\m.. i love that os, also i thought an AROS x86 would be way cool too

i vote meatwad with protons and nutrons flyin around him .. but the protons and nutrons could be jawbreakers.. lmao

ok you guys seem to be getting a bit off topic here. please go back and read the initial question again. implemented for ros after the w32 api is completed this is the main thing im concerned about and im possitive the devs agree with me on this one .. subsystems are simply an afterthought. :twisted: