Como me gustaría que microsoft patente fat.
con tantos filesystems ahi afuera, el soporte para fat disminuiría (o sea tambien afecta a los fabricantes de reproductores usb y otros).
despues de todo fat no es tan buen fs.

hola, (problemas con la afip?) La verdad que yo tengo el mismo problema, cuando quiero instalar programas en el directorio c o me dice que no tengo espacio o que no c puede escribir. El disco virtual (de qemu) es RW y yo meto el programa con una imagen iso que simula un cd (aun no c como manipular l...

Hola gente, soy novato y quiero ayudar con las traducciones tambien. Tengo el mismo problema no tengo idea donde poner los archivos traducidos. ni como nombrarlos. La verdad que me gustaría muchisimo que se organicen como equipo para traducir, asi habría lineamientos mas específicos, y sería mucho m...

if i could choose, i'd like that the official FS would b ext3/4 or another with good performance and features, and besides, try to avoid microsoft owned things, (cuz, a) i don't like them. and b) legal purpouses) I mean, if it doesn't low the compatibility. but i'm not the one to choose, are the dev...

Thanks a lot, that's what i was talking about.
I don't really know so much about the MS and ExtX FS. but i knew they had a built in feature to avoid fragment files so fast.

i think i'll be a nice feature _in the future_ to suport something like this, even in Fat32

thanks for the tip. i like to test the more updated things i can.

As reactos is aimed to be fully compatible, i just thought i'll be a nice add-on. Because i didn't thought they will drop Fat as a supported FS. but i guess most applications don't care what fs is installed.

Carlo Bramix:
I liked the Com0Com

Thanks hto.

Mrkaras:
i'm not correcting u, but as i send a bug, i had to set the severity of the problem, either way, i'm sure that when a developer takes that problem he will judge the real severity it has.

Hello, i hope noone would get angry because i reutilize this topic. I just want to give a suggestion. I would really like that reactos (in some future) makes fragmentation in the fs the less possible. and it'll b great that reatos couyld "defragment in the background". What i really mean i...

personally i would like to have the exposee version, but as i'm not going to do the coding....
either way, i think that they should be considering implementing things to do some cool things from now.

Because implementing just the simplest way, will make troubles in the future.

thanks a lot "hto", i've already readed that topic but still didn't understood what exactly should i do if i found a bug. I suppose now, that i must report it throught bugzilla. but i thought you wouldn't let anyone to just post a bug. sorry, i'm really new at this community. My best wishe...

hello,
i just found about react os, and i like the idea, and i think you are doing pretty well.
I'm not a very good programer, neither i have too much time, but i'd like to help doing some testing.
but i don't know how are u organized to do this. can anyone tell me ?
i mean, what should i do?