Issue 3. [Re: [ros-general] ROS-User-Issues]

[jwalsh at bigpond.net.au]

Thanks David.

That is what I am trying to figure out  myself.
It was the rare courtesy I found here, which has kept me here this long.

That appears to be running out, now that it is discovered I don't blindly follow the dictates of leaders. It's an Australian obsession.

The answers I need to get go beyond the mere "Part Fabrication" or the "Componant Assembly". I've done my time in industry and retired, a slave no longer.

I need to know this:  Will I actually be working for Microsoft? For nothing?
 
As I said from the outset, I'm  here only because I see the writing on the wall for 9x.

My ISP has sent all of us a blunt eviction (by stealth) notice, otherwise, I like most other simple DOS  users, am more than  happy with what I have already.
They also said  their policy is conditioned by Microsoft.
I don't really need NT. Is it something I have got to have?

However it seems that no reason at all need be given, by reactOS, why we must relocate to NT (irrespective of whether it is FAt or not).
Its a strange attitude for a socalled free organisation.

So I guess  by stalling for time I might elicite from the Ros-Users a credible answer.
I'm definately not stalking or trolling. 

I am carefull not to put a lot of energy into a "Code Farm", for the large corporations (to my knowledge M$  invented the practice, I've merely identified it).  

I still wish you all Good Cheer and a rosuccess.

Thanks for the opportunity

Justin



---- David Hinz <post.center at gmail.com> wrote: 
> _______________________________________________
> ros-general mailing list
> ros-general at reactos.org
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-general