Issue 3. [Re: [ros-general] ROS-User-Issues]

[Thomas Weidenmueller]

jwalsh at bigpond.net.au wrote:
> I take it you are saying, no it is not an issue worth pursuing.
> 
> I'm interested if there might be an similar solid opinion regarding the other points as well.
> 
> So from your explanation it sounds like a good thing i.e taking something which is well grounded and building on it. Forward to perfection so to speak.
> 
> I must admit that I have not as yet had good results: It simply does not work on my stock standard Thankpad 600E. [Please I am not asking for it either]. learning about it is the way I work.

I really wish i'd understand what you're trying to accomplish here at
all. I've read most of your posts and I just don't it. I don't think it
makes much sense spending time thinking/discussing about failed theories
or technologies that failed decades ago, we're not going to revive them
no matter how good they seem. There's a reason they're not used anymore.

Again, I wish i understood the purpose of all these threads here - and I
guess I'm not the only person.

- Thomas