[ros-general] $$$ Bountys on ReactOS development - 0.2 Relase

[Jason Filby]

Hi

I'm not at against the Non Profit accepting doncations. As for
business: 
I think that the licensing terms of the GNU General Public License
are 
enough to keep businesses in line. For one thing, if a business does
not 
comply, they will be shunned by the developer community and receive
some 
nasty press. The great thing is that you have several companies with
the 
same core product. This means that they have to be sure to offer 
superior service and keep up good relations with the community
instead 
of resting on their Intellectual Property laurels.

Cheers
Jason

Steven Edwards wrote:

>Yes and I agree with that to a degree. I think we need to see some
>
>companys supporting ReactOS but I also want to see the Foundation up
>
>and running. Having support from buiness is a good thing but not at
the
>
>expense of a Non-Profit organization dedicated to the idea of
ReactOS. 
>
>
>
>A For-Profit company exist for one goal and thats to make money.
Even
>
>if Jason company is 100% owned by him today, 5 years down the road
it
>
>might be owned by a large number of others that dont give a flip
about
>
>ReactOS but only the bottom line. Thats find as long as the rules
are
>
>played by with the GPL/LGPL. But I want to see us move forward on
both.
>
>I want companys to adopt ReactOS and ReactOS developers to be free
to
>
>make money off of thier work.
>
>
>
>Thanks
>
>Steven
>
>
>
>
>  
>


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes
http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus