[ros-general] why folks

[James Tabor]

KJK::Hyperion wrote:
> At 22.46 18/02/2004, you wrote:
> 
>> (no idea about hyperion's motives to react the way he does)
> 
> 
> Normally here I'd spew some witticisms, collect the applause, bow and go 
> home. I'll try, instead, to (gasp!) rationalize. Let's say I ask you 
> "are you eterosexual?", and after you reply I ask you, with the 
> straightest face, "why?", and won't take "because" as a reply (because, 
> hey, you've invested your whole life on your sexual orientation, and 
> you're telling me you put no planning or risk assessment in the 
> choice?). How would *you* react?

LOL! Oh my!

Everyone leave Hyperion alone,
James