[ros-general] Microsoft wants royalties for use of FAT
Vizzini
vizzini at plasmic.com
Wed Dec 10 16:00:41 UTC 2003
On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 21:33, Richard Campbell wrote:
> I regret i cannot recall any particular case, but IIRC it HAS happened.
> What we need is a lawyer.
Regardless, this is a matter for the courts, which means we have to
spend money fighting about it, which isn't cool.
> Steven Edwards wrote:
>
> >Hello Richard,
> >
> >--- Richard Campbell <eek2121 at comcast.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>If someone argues it's an industry standard and succeeds, the
> >>patented
> >>will be declared null.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Please show me a prior court case where this has happend?
> >
> >Even if it has I wouldnt want to fight like this. Patent law is not a
> >bad thing. If I develop something at my own cost/time and it is adopted
> >by everyone on the planet and becomes "industry standard" I am still
> >due my fair share until the patent runs out.
> >
> >Thanks
> >Steven
> >
> >
> >__________________________________
> >Do you Yahoo!?
> >New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing.
> >http://photos.yahoo.com/
> >_______________________________________________
> >ros-general mailing list
> >ros-general at reactos.com
> >http://reactos.com/mailman/listinfo/ros-general
> >
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> ros-general mailing list
> ros-general at reactos.com
> http://reactos.com/mailman/listinfo/ros-general
>
More information about the Ros-general
mailing list