[ros-general] Microsoft wants royalties for use of FAT
Rick Parrish
rfmobile at swbell.net
Sat Dec 6 15:49:41 UTC 2003
Mark IJbema wrote:
>Sounds fair, but is not compatible with the GPL afaik. Which doesn't
>have to be a problem, i don't see why we need to use the GPL for
>everything anyway (for example, i wouldn't care less if we included a
>notepad which was released under the BSD licence).
>
Yeah, that's why I used the phrase "available under GPL like terms".
-rick
More information about the Ros-general
mailing list