[ros-general] Microsoft wants royalties for use of FAT

Rick Parrish rfmobile at swbell.net
Sat Dec 6 15:49:41 UTC 2003


Mark IJbema wrote:

>Sounds fair, but is not compatible with the GPL afaik. Which doesn't
>have to be a problem, i don't see why we need to use the GPL for
>everything anyway (for example, i wouldn't care less if we included a
>notepad which was released under the BSD licence).
>
Yeah, that's why I used the phrase "available under GPL like terms".

-rick






More information about the Ros-general mailing list