[ros-dev] Status Meeting (November 2018)
Dick
dick at deds.nl
Wed Nov 28 18:35:49 UTC 2018
It is common use to start beta from 0.5 because it is half way up to 1.0.
bringing 0.5 as alpha willl cause much disappointment and is confusing for
users.
I think an interesting point to talk about would be a roadmap. when can
average users start to use reactos as their daily os? Is reactos able to
become usable as windows-alternative before windows is gone and forgotten?
On Wed, 28 Nov 2018, David Quintana (gigaherz) wrote:
> I agree on "beta" being more like 80-90% implementation coverage, however
> given the 80/20 rule applied to development, that says that < 20% of the
> bugs cause >80% of the bug reports (I'd guess this will be 5% of the bugs
> causing 95% of the reports, if not even more), so one could argue that
> having a codebase 80% complete, is still only 50% of the work, because the
> other 50% will be a whole lot of polishing.
>
> On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 at 18:03, Ged Murphy <gedmurphy.maillists at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> The link between 0.5 and beta was an old statement we used to
> have on our website, I’m not sure why that relationship existed
> other than a splitting an integer in half and assigning 0.5 to
> each stage.
>
> I’m more of the opinion that beta products are close to release,
> so 0.8+ would be more suitable.
>
>
>
> Anyway, it’s a conversation to be had internally.
>
>
>
> Ged.
>
>
>
> From: Ros-dev <ros-dev-bounces at reactos.org> On Behalf Of
> hermes.belusca at sfr.fr
> Sent: Wednesday, 28 November 2018 16:51
> To: ReactOS Development List <ros-dev at reactos.org>
> Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Status Meeting (November 2018)
>
>
>
> Hi!
>
> Usually when we talk about ReactOS 0.5, we implicitly think that
> it will enter beta state there.
> So unless you consider this to not completely hold anymore, we
> can look at what remains to be done/fixed (importantly) so that
> we may qualify as going into beta state.
> (And yes, USB and storage sound strongly as prerequisites for
> 0.5 in my opinion).
>
> Best,
> Hermes
>
> De : "Ged Murphy"
> A : "'ReactOS Development List'"
> Envoyé: mercredi 28 novembre 2018 17:42
> Objet : Re: [ros-dev] Status Meeting (November 2018)
>
>
> Some potential talking points:
>
>
>
> o Selecting a new coordinator
> o Version bump to 0.5
> o USB / Storage (perhaps linked to a 0.5 release)
> o Mattermost
> o New website progress
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Ros-dev <ros-dev-bounces at reactos.org> On Behalf Of Mark
> Jansen
> Sent: Wednesday, 28 November 2018 16:13
> To: ReactOS Development List <ros-dev at reactos.org>
> Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Status Meeting (November 2018)
>
>
>
> We can discuss this if you are present, but I don't see the
> value in discussing it without you.
>
> We have seen before that something discussed without the initiator
> being present is time not well spent, since it is a bit hard to argue
> with only one side of the argument present
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Op 26 nov. 2018 12:15 schreef hermes.belusca at sfr.fr:
>
> Hello,
>
> I may not be available as it's the day when I'm going
> somewhere for a conference; it just depends at which time
> I arrive at destination.
>
> For the meeting we may talk about the best way we can move
> to delivering all-in-one ReactOS ISOs (containing livecd +
> installation in both text and GUI modes), and which
> changes this could imply for our infrastructure
> (buildbots/website...).
>
> Best regards,
> Hermes
>
> De : "Javier Agustìn Fernàndez Arroyo"
> A : "ReactOS Development List"
> Envoyé: samedi 24 novembre 2018 22:06
> Objet : Re: [ros-dev] Status Meeting (November 2018)
>
>
> I'm at work but I will do my best to attend!
>
>
>
> El sáb., 24 nov. 2018 21:38, Colin Finck <colin at reactos.org>
> escribió:
>
> Hi all!
>
> Let me invite you to the November 2018 meeting,
> taking place next
> Thursday, November 29, 2018 at 19:00 UTC.
> Invited members will again receive their credentials
> shortly before the
> meeting.
>
> This will be the first meeting since August and I
> hope we get some more
> topics than just the obligatory Status Reports.
> Please send your
> proposals by replying to this mail.
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Colin
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev at reactos.org
> http://reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev at reactos.org
> http://reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev at reactos.org
> http://reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev at reactos.org
> http://reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
>
>
More information about the Ros-dev
mailing list