[ros-dev] 4th scenario

[Love Nystrom]

On 2016-05-23 04.21, "David Quintana (gigaherz)" <gigaherz at gmail.com> wrote:
> No one is suggesting paging the kernel. Stop being paranoid about that.

Ah.. Excellent.. That's such a relief to hear :)

> We are speaking about API interfaces for user apps and drivers.
> Whatever that implies, will be examined on a case by case basis.  ;P

Good.. Then we are in full agreement :)

I'll sink my teeth into Timo's epic when I can.
I'm hoping there's some way we can avoid the mess SxS is causing on e.g 
my Win7.
(I must have 10 versions of each RTL since 2oo5 installed by SxS ,
and dito with comctl32 versions, all with these obnoxiously long names.)

>
> On 22 May 2016 at 23:14, Love Nystrom <love.nystrom at gmail.com 
> <mailto:love.nystrom at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Server 2oo3 might not be used in big corporations anymore,
>     but I think it's not uncommon to keep running it in small companies
>     and home servers (due to high licensing cost of Windows server
>     versions).
>
>     Anyway.. IMO there's nothing wrong in moving towards NT6x API-wise,
>     as long as we're not forced to re-architect the *core* of the system
>     (scheduler, et c).  Paging the kernel would be a big mistake.
>
>     Best Regards
>     // Neo
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.reactos.org/pipermail/ros-dev/attachments/20160523/2909a37a/attachment.html>