[ros-dev] 4th scenario

[Love Nystrom]

Server 2oo3 might not be used in big corporations anymore,
but I think it's not uncommon to keep running it in small companies
and home servers (due to high licensing cost of Windows server versions).

Anyway.. IMO there's nothing wrong in moving towards NT6x API-wise,
as long as we're not forced to re-architect the *core* of the system
(scheduler, et c).  Paging the kernel would be a big mistake.

Best Regards
// Neo


On 2016-05-22 18.42, ros-dev-request at reactos.org wrote:
> They are not fucked up, since they legitimately don't care for the 3 
> people out there still using 2k3.
> And we are not fucked up, we are only pushed to move to NT6+
>
> Timo
>
> Am 21.05.2016 um 06:12 schrieb Love Nystrom:
>> No, they are... Not we ;)
>> Same thing would happen if you try to run e.g. a Vista exe on NT4.
>>
>> // Neo
>>
>> On 2016-05-20 22.52, Javier Agustìn Fernàndez Arroyo 
>> <elhoir at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Pale Moon drops ReactOS support
>> > Date: 2016-05-20 22.51
>> >
>> > 4th scenario - App is actually "buggy" and doesnt check for any 
>> export. We´re fucked up :P

-- 
There is one thing stronger than all the armies in the world,
and that's an idea whose time has come. [Victor Hugo]

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.reactos.org/pipermail/ros-dev/attachments/20160523/608389c1/attachment.html>