[ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [spetreolle] 65378: [ADVAPI_WINETEST] Make peace^W tests, not war.☮ Wave a hello to sysreg so that it doesn't kill us. ROSTESTS-56

Thomas Faber thomas.faber at reactos.org
Tue Nov 11 21:17:04 UTC 2014


Hmm, my thought behind disabling this was more that this one test
doesn't justify increasing our whole test run time by 10%.


On 2014-11-11 11:12, spetreolle at svn.reactos.org wrote:
> Author: spetreolle
> Date: Tue Nov 11 16:12:14 2014
> New Revision: 65378
>
> URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos?rev=65378&view=rev
> Log:
> [ADVAPI_WINETEST]
> Make peace^W tests, not war.☮
> Wave a hello to sysreg so that it doesn't kill us.
> ROSTESTS-56
>
> Modified:
>      trunk/rostests/winetests/advapi32/service.c
>
> Modified: trunk/rostests/winetests/advapi32/service.c
> URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos/trunk/rostests/winetests/advapi32/service.c?rev=65378&r1=65377&r2=65378&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- trunk/rostests/winetests/advapi32/service.c	[iso-8859-1] (original)
> +++ trunk/rostests/winetests/advapi32/service.c	[iso-8859-1] Tue Nov 11 16:12:14 2014
> @@ -2166,6 +2166,9 @@
>       DWORD le1, le2;
>       SERVICE_STATUS status;
>
> +#ifdef __REACTOS__
> +    fprintf(stdout, "ROSTESTS-56: Hello sysreg, I am awake\n");
> +#endif
>       ret = StartServiceA(svc_handle, 0, NULL);
>       le1 = GetLastError();
>       ok(!ret, "%s: StartServiceA() should have failed\n", name);
> @@ -2260,12 +2263,6 @@
>            * insanely long timeout: 120s. So skip the rest of the tests.
>            */
>           win_skip("Skip some service start/stop tests on NT4\n");
> -        goto cleanup;
> -    }
> -
> -    if (!winetest_interactive)
> -    {
> -        skip("ROSTESTS-56: Skipping service start timeout tests!\n");
>           goto cleanup;
>       }
>




More information about the Ros-dev mailing list