[ros-dev] Core developer
Andrew Faulds
ajfweb at googlemail.com
Tue May 8 10:42:03 UTC 2012
Problem is DOSBox doesn't integrate with host OS aside from "mounting"
drives. If we wanted Win3.x apps to run we'd need to include Windows
3.x or make our own.
On 8 May 2012 11:27, Wesley Parish <wes.parish at paradise.net.nz> wrote:
> MS Win 3.0 as largely a DOS extender written large, with a graphical
> interface.
>
> MS Win 3.1 had a bit more of the 32-bit disk access and the like; iirc it
> made better use of protected memory - though not much. It liked crashing.
>
> MS Win 3.1 Windows For Workgroups was a lot closer to a 32-bit system,
> though it - much like the remainder of the Win 3.x/9.x lineup - relied on
> DOS as a boot loader and thunked its merry way through int21h and the like.
>
> MS Win NT was built on a different model, taken almost completely
> lock-stock-and-barrel from DEC's VMS and related systems. NT didn't need DOS
> - in fact, it tended to crash badly written Win/DOS applications.
>
> I expect DOSBox will run Win3.x/9.x apps without too much trouble, provided
> they can access suitable DLLs.
>
>
> On 8/05/2012, at 10:02 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
>
>> Am 08.05.2012 11:47, schrieb Andrew Faulds:
>>>
>>> Ah, I see. Windows 3.1 was a 32-bit kernel running 16-bit applications,
>>> how odd.
>>>
>>
>> Ehm... no. Windows 3.x was a 16-bit system though it needed the protected
>> mode to run (to perform 32-bit disk access, etc.).
>>
>> Only Windows 95 was a (more) true 32-bit system (like Windows NT 3.1 was
>> already).
>>
>> Regards,
>> Sven
>>
>>> On 8 May 2012 10:37, Sven Barth<pascaldragon at googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Am 08.05.2012 11:33, schrieb Andrew Faulds:
>>>>
>>>>> Oh, I didn't think of that. Windows 3.x applications run in NTVDM?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes as they are basically "DOS applications" as well. Only Windows 95
>>>> introduced a difference.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Sven
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Ros-dev mailing list
>>>> Ros-dev at reactos.org
>>>> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ros-dev mailing list
>> Ros-dev at reactos.org
>> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev at reactos.org
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
--
Andrew Faulds (AJF)
http://ajf.me/
More information about the Ros-dev
mailing list