[ros-dev] Re : Debug log problems

[caemyr at myopera.com]

VBox 4.0.x was indeed broken, but 4.1.x is a lot better. It also
is able to use extended CPU virtualisation functions, present
from Nehalem upwards, thus its running on windows testbot.





On Thu, Jun 7, 2012, at 09:46 AM, Александр wrote:





07.06.2012, 01:53, "caemyr at myopera.com" <caemyr at myopera.com>:

Works fine on VBox 4.1.16?

We kinda dont support Vbox 3 as its... old and having problems
with com output?





 W00T?!

  I used to be told by a lot of devs that Vbox 4 is buggy suxx,
and VirtualBox 3.2.14 is a better one. So where is the truth?







On Wed, Jun 6, 2012, at 03:57 PM, Sylvain Petreolle wrote:



Kind regards,
Sylvain Petreolle
  ____________________________________________________________

De : Aleksey Bragin <[1]aleksey at reactos.org>
À : ReactOS Development List <[2]ros-dev at reactos.org>
Envoyé le : Mercredi 6 juin 2012 14h45
Objet : [ros-dev] Debug log problems



--

With best regards

Caemyr

  _______________________________________________

Ros-dev mailing list

[3]Ros-dev at reactos.org

[4]http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev

--

С наилучшими пожеланиями, Александр.

_______________________________________________

Ros-dev mailing list

[5]Ros-dev at reactos.org

[6]http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev



--

With best regards

Caemyr

References

1. mailto:aleksey at reactos.org
2. mailto:ros-dev at reactos.org
3. mailto:Ros-dev at reactos.org
4. http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
5. mailto:Ros-dev at reactos.org
6. http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.reactos.org/pipermail/ros-dev/attachments/20120607/78c0c4ad/attachment.html>