[ros-dev] February 2012 Meeting Minutes

[Javier Agustìn Fernàndez Arroyo]

well, i think thats being done, in some way. Lets see:

"alpha channel" may be the regular daily builds, which can be totally
broken, completely unstable... or not. "use them at your own risk" (tm)

"beta channel" are releases done right after branching (with the -RC tag)

and "stable releases", considering those are not actually stables, are the
so-called 0.3.13, 0.3.14, 0.3.12, 0.3.10.... and so

On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Emanuel Rietveld <codehotter at gmail.com>wrote:

>
> What do you think about developing multiple channels simultaneously? After
> 2 months, release alpha, after 2 months, release beta, after another 2
> months, released. That way, new features appear 'on the radar' every 2
> months, but they don't need to be completely polished for 6 months. Users
> would expect Beta to be generally usable, even if there are some bugs or
> regressions, and you'd do your best to keep Alpha usable, but don't
> guarantee anything.
>
> Emanuel
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev at reactos.org
> http://www.reactos.org/**mailman/listinfo/ros-dev<http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.reactos.org/pipermail/ros-dev/attachments/20120227/22502fec/attachment.htm>