[ros-dev] Monthly status meeting reminder

[Igor Paliychuk]

About ARWINSS adoption: Dunno if Aleksey said some details about it but as i
understand he will be not present during that voting. So as one of the main
arwinss testers i propose the next point. I don't think he meant he wants to
replace current win32 SS in trunk. So the idea is to add arwinss files to
trunk and make dual setup/booting or to add another bootcd/testcd target. So
we could vote for each of this ideas or just vote for merging in general. Or
both ;)
So if i'm missing some info about merging plans tell me please. Otherwise
let's just vote ;)

2011/7/28 Ged Murphy <gedmurphy.maillists at gmail.com>

> It's not about having something to hide, it's about having the confidence
> to
> speak openly about issues and not be concerned about who's listening in.
> I've never heard of organizations which undertake meetings in public, it
> seems ludicrous.
>
> ReactOS driver signing is an internal issue and unless the IRC server is
> private it should be dropped from the discussions.
>
> Ged.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ros-dev-bounces at reactos.org [mailto:ros-dev-bounces at reactos.org] On
> Behalf Of dmex
> Sent: 28 July 2011 15:54
> To: 'ReactOS Development List'
> Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Monthly status meeting reminder
>
> Private meetings really inspire confidence in the ReactOS project that it
> has nothing to hide.
>
> I myself will be observing the meeting to find out what's happening with
> driver signing as it may impact a project I participate in.
>
> If you have something to hide then I too suggest talking all future ReactOS
> developer meetings private.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ros-dev-bounces at reactos.org [mailto:ros-dev-bounces at reactos.org] On
> Behalf Of Ged Murphy
> Sent: Thursday, 28 July 2011 10:28 PM
> To: 'ReactOS Development List'
> Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Monthly status meeting reminder
>
> Really??? I had no idea this was the case.
> I thought the whole point of having it on private servers was to restrict
> who or what could read the logs.
>
> I suggest this be changed to make the meetings private.
> People should be able to talk freely without the worry of having what they
> say logged by unknown 3rd parties.
>
> Ged.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ros-dev-bounces at reactos.org [mailto:ros-dev-bounces at reactos.org] On
> Behalf Of Colin Finck
> Sent: 28 July 2011 15:15
> To: ReactOS Development List
> Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Monthly status meeting reminder
>
>
>  Ged Murphy wrote:
> > Can I just confirm that the channel is only available to people in the
> > list and not the general public?
>
>  No, it is and has always been open to everybody who likes to join.
>  People without username and password can just act as observers though,  so
> they cannot talk and vote.
>  This is also why we have voiced and non-voiced people during the  meeting.
>
>
>  - Colin
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev at reactos.org
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev at reactos.org
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev at reactos.org
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev at reactos.org
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.reactos.org/pipermail/ros-dev/attachments/20110728/6b4cd318/attachment-0001.htm>