[ros-dev] Wine Gecko

[Zachary Gorden]

Probably will be in the future.  Only reason it wasn't was because I was not
aware of the concern, the component wasn't listed on any of the packaging
pages as should be included, and none of the testers pointed out a desire
for it.  One of the devs says he suggested this a while ago, but I had no
awareness of the suggestion.

On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Adam Kachwalla <geekdundee at gmail.com>wrote:

>  Shouldn't matter too much... we stick rosapps and rostests in there as
> optional components, I'm sure Wine Gecko shouldn't be too much of a problem
> to insert this way.
>
>   On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 01:24:28 +1100, Olaf Siejka <caemyr at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>  Sure, why dont we add another 5-10 minutes to ros compile time....
>
> As for integration i just placed wine_gecko-1.0.0-x86.cab in
> trunk\modules\optional\
>
> Regards
>
> 2010/10/27 Adam Kachwalla <geekdundee at gmail.com>
>
>>  What about Wine Gecko from source? Also, I would think that because it
>> is a GPL module, it wouldn't matter if the binaries are there or not?
>>
>> http://wiki.winehq.org/BuildingWineGecko
>>
>> By the way, did you have to extract the cab file into the modules/optional
>> folder, or how did you integrate it?
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>  --
> Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day.
> Teach a man to fish and he will eat for a lifetime.
> Give a man religion and he will die praying for a fish.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev at reactos.org
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.reactos.org/pipermail/ros-dev/attachments/20101027/a0da16f9/attachment.htm>