[ros-dev] Arwinss presentation

[Ged Murphy]

On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Colin Finck <mail at colinfinck.de> wrote:

>
> Maybe because we already had this one in July:
> http://www.reactos.org/pipermail/ros-dev/2009-July/011896.html
>
> As I'm not a Win32k dev, I shouldn't argue about technical details. But I
> still don't believe that all the points expressed in e.g.
> http://www.reactos.org/pipermail/ros-dev/2009-July/011933.html are
> suddenly
> invalid, so that we can easily say that Arwinss is "the better
> architecture". For me, it looks like the slides want to give this
> impression.
>
> Of course, I also want to see ReactOS going forward and Arwinss can surely
> help for now. But simply accepting it as our new official Win32k
> architecture.... I don't think we can make it that easy after all previous
> opinions.
>

I agree with Colin on this.
I think arwinss is a great idea, but I still see it as a temporary solution
until the real win32 subsystem can match it.

Ged
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.reactos.org/pipermail/ros-dev/attachments/20100119/a6eed0af/attachment.htm