[ros-dev] Re : MmSecureVirtualMemory

[Alex Ionescu]

This function is broken by design and nobody should be using it because it doesn't guarantee anything.

Therefore this function saying "ok!!!" is about as useful as it actually doing anything.

On 2010-01-02, at 7:20 AM, Sylvain Petreolle wrote:

> Faking success for this kind of function can lead to great race conditions,
> according to its documentation...
> Is this ok to have a "it mysteriously (doesn't) work" state ?
>  
> Kind regards,
> Sylvain Petreolle
> 
> 
> De : Alex Ionescu <ionucu at videotron.ca>
> À : ReactOS Development List <ros-dev at reactos.org>
> Envoyé le : Sam 2 Janvier 2010, 3 h 08 min 15 s
> Objet : Re: [ros-dev] MmSecureVirtualMemory
> 
> It's already been fixed.
> 
> On 2010-01-01, at 8:02 PM, Olaf Siejka wrote:
> 
>> Could anyone please consider implementing the above? According to http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms802934.aspx - MmUnsecureVirtualMemory could be required as well.
>> 
>> Lack of those functions is currently breaking up 3d acceleration passthrough with Virtualbox 3.1.0 and newer.
>> 
>> Thanks in advance
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ros-dev mailing list
>> Ros-dev at reactos.org
>> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
> 
> Best regards,
> Alex Ionescu
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev at reactos.org
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev

Best regards,
Alex Ionescu

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.reactos.org/pipermail/ros-dev/attachments/20100102/fa8e4a6b/attachment-0001.htm