[ros-dev] Re : MmSecureVirtualMemory

[Sylvain Petreolle]

Faking success for this kind of function can lead to great race conditions,
according to its documentation...
Is this ok to have a "it mysteriously (doesn't) work" state ?

 Kind regards,
Sylvain Petreolle


>
>De : Alex Ionescu <ionucu at videotron.ca>
>À : ReactOS Development List <ros-dev at reactos.org>
>Envoyé le : Sam 2 Janvier 2010, 3 h 08 min 15 s
>Objet : Re: [ros-dev] MmSecureVirtualMemory
>
>It's already been fixed.
>
>
>On 2010-01-01, at 8:02 PM, Olaf Siejka wrote:
>
>Could anyone please consider implementing the above? According to http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms802934.aspx - MmUnsecureVirtualMemory could be required as well.
>>
>>Lack of those functions is currently breaking up 3d acceleration passthrough with Virtualbox 3.1.0 and newer.
>>
>>
>>
>>Thanks in advance
>>_______________________________________________
>>Ros-dev mailing list
>>Ros-dev at reactos.org
>>http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>>
>
>Best regards,
>Alex Ionescu 
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.reactos.org/pipermail/ros-dev/attachments/20100102/7ff80a79/attachment.htm