[ros-dev] rosapps
Aleksey Bragin
aleksey at reactos.org
Thu Mar 12 11:29:43 CET 2009
So, are there any objections in separating thirdparty, additional,
sometimes helpful stuff into addons module, and having all apps which
exist in Windows, but aren't required for booting into rosapps?
Please, let's come to a solution, because having such a trash can
which rosapps is now is unbearable.
WBR,
Aleksey Bragin.
On Mar 9, 2009, at 2:50 AM, Ged wrote:
> I would opt for deleting everything in rosapps.
>
> I’m not really sure why it’s important to start rearranging it as
> there’s very little of use in there.
>
>
>
> As per our project mandate we aren’t interested in anything which
> isn’t core.
>
>
>
> Ged.
>
>
>
>
>
> From: ros-dev-bounces at reactos.org [mailto:ros-dev-
> bounces at reactos.org] On Behalf Of Aleksey Bragin
> Sent: 08 March 2009 18:16
> To: ReactOS Development List
> Subject: Re: [ros-dev] rosapps
>
>
>
> I'll explain his idea.
>
>
>
> The idea he would likes to propose is to separate the mess inside
> rosapps, and provide a clear division of what goes where:
>
> 1. trunk/reactos contains ONLY stuff which is vital for the system
> to work minimally. Including explorer, GUI, and things like that,
> but without calculator, solitaire, or anything like that.
>
> 2. rosapps - components similar to those present in Windows, but
> not vital for the boot process.
>
> 3. addons - components, which are additional to the base set of
> apps and drivers Windows ships with.
>
>
>
> Comments are welcome on his idea.
>
>
>
> My own comment is that the idea seems to recall what we originally
> been discussing a year or more ago, but stopped caring as more devs
> got more powerful PCs. There is no strict solution on what goes
> where now, actually that's why his idea started - he proposed to
> move winver and winhlp back to trunk, and I was arguing over it.
>
>
>
>
>
> WBR,
>
> Aleksey Bragin.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mar 8, 2009, at 7:02 PM, Zachary Gorden wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Huh? The rosapps module isn't included by default in the build to
> begin with, so how does it decrease build time? Also, the
> applications in there are supposed to be providing equivalent
> functionality found in Windows. Downloader is an exception, but
> what else is?
>
> On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 8:00 AM, Dmitry Chapyshev
> <lentind at yandex.ru> wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> I suggest to divide rosapps on two parts:
>
> 1) Components which are present in Windows (rosapps)
> 2) 3rd party components (3rdapps)
>
> In rosapps it is necessary to place all components without which the
> system can normally work (calc, hh, winhlp32, charmap, games and etc)
>
> In 3rdapps components which are not present in Windows (downloader,
> imagesoft and etc) will take places
>
> Such placing of components will allow to reduce compilation time as
> you
> can not compile not the modules necessary to you (rosapps and/or
> 3rdapps)
>
> Please tell your opinion on my proposition.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.reactos.org/pipermail/ros-dev/attachments/20090312/6d8b294e/attachment.html
More information about the Ros-dev
mailing list