[ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [tkreuzer] 38673: Inline wrappers user32 -> NtUser

[Timo Kreuzer]

Dmitry Gorbachev wrote:
>> Well that was a workaround, because of "static declaration follows non
>> static declaration".
>> Then it needs to be done differently. But I don't see any good solution
>> that doesn't require lot's of hacks atm, except disabling that warning.
>>     
>
> It's ok atm. Attribute gnu_inline can be used to get old inline semantics.
>   
Sorry I didn't quite get it. ;-) What is ok atm? How are we going to
handle it?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.reactos.org/pipermail/ros-dev/attachments/20090111/69f389d4/attachment.html