[ros-dev] GCC 4.4.x -- What's missing?

[Daniel Reimer]

Sure it is. But explain this to the lazy bums out there :-P

Nah, honestly, I dont think theres a real reason except the big step 
having to update gcc.

Alex Ionescu schrieb:
> Forcing people to use a new RosBE is a *good* thing.
>
> On 2009-12-31, at 12:15 AM, Daniel Reimer wrote:
>
>    
>> Good question. I wonder, too. Problem could be that this patch forces
>> ppl to use a new RosBE. At least last time i tried, it broke gcc 4.1.X
>> build.
>>
>> Alex Ionescu schrieb:
>>      
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> As far as I am aware, GCC 4.4.x now works on Linux through RosBE 1.5 (minus some missing patches for 64-bit hosts), and I've gotten it to work on SnowLeopard with some minor hacks -- ie, all that's missing is for Colin, when he has time, to integrate the little fixes for these non-standard hosts.
>>>
>>> As for Windows, I think there is a fully working binary GCC 4.4.x/RosBE that builds trunk just fine.
>>>
>>> So what's missing for 4.4.x to become official, RosBE 1.5 to RTM, and for the 4.4.x patch from BZ to be committed (The one that gets trunk building)?
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Alex Ionescu
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ros-dev mailing list
>>> Ros-dev at reactos.org
>>> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>        
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ros-dev mailing list
>> Ros-dev at reactos.org
>> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>>      
> Best regards,
> Alex Ionescu
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev at reactos.org
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
>