[ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [sserapion] 44807: Add definitions for the x86bios emulator. http://www.geoffchappell.com/viewer.htm?doc=studies/windows/km/hal/api/x86bios/index.htm

[Timo Kreuzer]

LOL, I love that "I couldn't find any documentation on MSDN and in some
arbitrary collection of headers, so it must not exist".

I also never talked about MS provided documentation. 3rd party
documentation still qualifies as documentation and it's better than
nothing, if not even better than a lot of MS documentation.

Here, for you to read:
http://www.geoffchappell.com/viewer.htm?doc=studies/windows/km/hal/api/x86bios/index.htm&tx=7

Maybe it helps you to understand that x86Bios functions have absolutely
nothing to do with EFI.

Done.
Timo

Alex Ionescu wrote:
> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=safari&rls=en&q=%22x86BiosCall%22+site%3Amicrosoft.com&aq=f&oq=&aqi=
>
> Your search - "x86BiosCall" site:microsoft.com - did not match any documents.
>
> bash-3.2$ grep -ir 'x86BiosCall' /ntdev/headers/ --include *.h --include *.c
> bash-3.2$
>
> Your turn.
>
> On 2009-12-30, at 12:23 PM, Timo Kreuzer wrote:
>
>   
>> Prove it.
>>
>> Alex Ionescu wrote:
>>     
>>> The services are undocumented and reserved for EFI.
>>>
>>> They are not "Documented" and there's no reason to use the Vista implementation.
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ros-dev mailing list
>> Ros-dev at reactos.org
>> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>>     
>
> Best regards,
> Alex Ionescu
>
>
>   
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev at reactos.org
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev